piecat @ piecat @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

581

Joined

2 yr. ago

It isn't that AI will have replaced us in 24 months, it's that we will be enslaved in 24 months. Or in the matrix. Etc.

My absolute favorite is when I asked copilot to code a UI button and it just pasted "// the UI element should do (...) but instead it is doing (...)" a dozen times.

Like, clearly someone on stackoverflow asked for help, got used for training data, and confused copilot

It's the fact they vouched for the resturaunt.

I don't mean having a sign or directory. I mean saying specifically "the BR at our rest stop is allergy friendly" vs "our rest stop has a basken robbins, check their page for details"

I don't know any other landlords that advertise and vouch their clients on their website.

I bet cafeterias or food courts have gotten sued for the same thing.

I don't get what it has to do with copyright?

It's as simple as they built the equipment to require an app. And it needs the cloud, so its either accept the license or stop using the hw.

It's happening everywhere.

Judges have immunity when acting in their official duties.

If court were in session, that could be a real possibility. But it wasn't, the girl was there for a fieldtrip.

Kinda like police immunity. They can shoot you and your dog, but if they aren't on duty, they don't have that qualified immunity.

I don't see your point.

Building fossil fuel power infrastructure does nothing to move the needle, but building renewables does.

What are you actually proposing? Because it reads as "we shouldn't try because any benefits or impacts are long-term"

But the fun thing is that once we reach a critical point, it will go from having a positive carbon impact to a negative carbon impact. But we can never get there if we never start

It's all about scale and infrastructure.

The overlap between "chemtrails" and "fluoride in the water" and "epa bad" is pretty high. It's actually kinda odd.

Fair enough, there's potential for landfills to leak.

But if its between that, dumping it in the ocean, or exporting it, the landfill wins.

Does secret service have to protect him in prison?

I read the snippets and abstract. I'm not seeing how these micro plastics are getting out of the landfills.

Environmental risks of microplastics in landfills

In landfills, microplastics are not standalone pollutants. Generally, such tiny particles can adsorb various harmful chemicals due to its large specific surface area [54].

Never knew that!

In this case, microplastics generally served as the vector for migrating adsorbed pollutants including heavy metals, antibiotics and other pharmaceutical and personal care products [55].

That's scary, microplastics can absorb and spread pollutants!

But I'm not seeing anything about how they're getting out from a landfill. I even read a few of the referenced articles. But nothing about if or how they're getting out.

How does buried plastic cause microplastics to leech everywhere?

Weathering (sun, exposure, abrasion caused by plastic being moved by wind and sea) is a significant part of microplastic formation.

Quite honestly, going to a landfill seems so so so much better than the alternative: going into the environment and oceans, turning into microplastics and getting into food chains.

At least landfills are contained. Bury the shit until we have the tech to deal with it.

Some day, between the plastics, nutrients from organics, e-waste, landfills are going to be a goldmine.

Theocracy

Huh. Nothing to do woth religion...

There's going to be no external interference when you're under water. Sea water makes an excellent em shield

It's going to happen more than a few times until people learn. Same with deepfakes

Woah that's incredible

Do they pay more taxes?

"Anti-anything-nice"