photonic_sorcerer @ photonic_sorcerer @lemmy.dbzer0.com

I'm just a simple man, trying to make his way in the universe.

---

Read more

Posts

15

Comments

1,595

Joined

2 yr. ago

Debian hasn't done me dirty yet

I'm not saying I believe they're conscious, all I said was that I don't know and neither do you.

Of course we know what's happening in processors. We know what's happening in neuronal matter too. What we don't know is how consciousness or sentience emerges from large networks of neurons.

An LLM is only one part of a complete AI agent. What exactly happens in a processer at inference time? What happens when you continuously prompt the system with stimuli?

I'm just a meat computer running fucked-up software written by the process of evolution. I honestly don't know how sentient Grok or any modern AI system is and I'd wager you don't either.

Indeed

Grok could say the same thing about you... And I'd agree.

Pretty sure that's the optional sounding attachment.

Oh. I thought since his third wouldn't be consecutive with his first two, it'd be legal. I guess it depends on how they define consecutive.

That would apply to Obama's hypothetical third term too, no?

Brits don't like to be associated with the European rabble 😬

I'd give it a 20-30% likelihood. We shouldn't rule it out.

It wouldn't have required any of the main player's active effort. The supporting security establishment could have set up such a system.

Collateral damage matters to those in power insofar as the victims are popular with the voting public.

Eh, they could have had a service forwarding the messages to a database running on one of the group's member's devices.

Is this new system, R-Mode, invulnerable to jamming? It uses radio spectrum, so I'd think not, but it's not mentioned in the article.

What do these mean, who is sending them and why?

They're command line tools. If you want to get something done you have to put in a little effort.

Sweet, thanks for the info

But the information wasn't deceitful, it was verifiably true. The people this looks bad for is those involved in the group chat, save the journalist. It looks especially bad for Mike Waltz, the user who added the journalist to the chat. I suppose i just don't see how the Trumpists could benefit from this leaking the way it has.

International warfare seems pretty elaborate to me, or am I misunderstanding your point?