Yeah, this is the way how to interact with it. It makes sense as well, because it's only predicting the next word based on the previous words, so it had can in hindsight find a lot more stuff and in general be smarter about it.
Absolutely, and it's astonishing, that still so few people see how "deep in shit" we already are, and I really hope that very soon ( < 5 years or so) a lot more people through whatever means will start to see that. *But* I think it's not a good idea to go into the *doomsday* mood, I don't think that helps either (individually, say depression etc. inability for action). But yeah it's depressing how little this topic is still relevant in politics etc. and how little the scientific community is/was heard, that is telling us that we need to change like > 70 years ago (and a very soft transition would've been possible since than, not so much now unfortunately, whether we do it, or nature does it...).
Certainly, it will be really "interesting" how to produce food for ~10 billion people in this uncertain future. But if we finally learn to accept that e.g. cattle isn't the way forward, I think it may be possible with plant-based food. Although something like vertical farming etc. is definitely not viable today, it may be in the future. And at least currently it's totally possible to sustainably produce enough (plant-based) food.
I think we'll learn to adapt, that much I trust in agricultural-technological advancement etc.
But it will be "meaty" for most people and conflicts will arise (as they already are, see e.g. the conflict in Sudan that is indirectly related to climate change already, similarly as Syria previously (there were quite a few droughts the years before))
For whom though? I think if your product is going to be very expensive because of that you,ll try to find ways (less carbon emissive) to make it cheaper, and for others, who have low emissions already, they get an advantage. Also rich people generally emit much more carbon than poor people.
I'm a little bit tired of the argument, that everything gets expensive, like the money just goes to nirvana, it's a tax and a tax should steer industries (mostly) to do the right thing (in this case emit less CO2). The money can go directly to people e.g. in the form of a universal basic income.
They emit a lot, but they transport ... a very lot. Trucks are higher emitters per comodity.
Still both should be powered by something else like hydrogen (more interesting for ships I guess) or batteries...
And cruise ships should be IMHO taxed so high (the tax should probably directly go to countermeasures), such that only very rich people are able to (not that I grant them the fun, but they should finance this climate disaster in every possible way...)
Yeah especially if it isn't done on the GPU (where branch optimization certainly makes more sense). branch prediction in CPUs is pretty smart these days.
Ahh I just hit a wound. Just checked your history, of course how could I not see it, a climate-change denier as well, had to be... Well so you're probably already lost then...
Haha, I came to the same conclusion, but to be fair he's not from lemmy, he's just a lost soul in the fediverse (nothing against kbin though) strenuously believing that the devs of lemmy have evil intent and sell us all to "communist china" lol.
The world will never be safe... (increasingly accelerated by climate change). The point that the devs are malicious actors still has to be proven, and I don't see any evidence yet. They have their own instance that they control and censor/moderate (and openly so btw.), I'm totally fine with that, but the open source project certainly doesn't have the intent to be malicious (well to some regard in taking reddits userbase ^^).
Anyway I'm not continuing feeding the troll, have a nice day and please don't fall to conspiracy theories (believing that the lemmy devs are malicious actors is probably the first step in that direction...)
Sorry, but I start to believe that you're not actually a(n experienced) software engineer with open source experience. The codebase isn't that big and complex, though admittedly it's big enough that I haven't checked every detail yet, but again, I'm by far not the only person that watches, reads, reasons and audits the code, and that's what makes open source so secure. Btw. I can absolutely reason about code I'm reading, I'm not exactly sure what you mean with auditing, but for me that is reading and understanding what the code does...
The bigger the system gets the more valuable it is a target
Well the bigger an open source project gets, the more contributors (not always, but definitely in this case) have insight into the codebase and more likely see malicious intent. So in that regard: it will get safer over time.
In case you haven't understood my previous argument. I trust code I can actually read and reason about (compared to e.g. reddit, facebook etc.).
And just to prove my point, I am already looking over the codebase of lemmy, because there are obviously a lot of things that can still be improved, but malicious intent I haven't found yet. And if I have missed something, other people will certainly find such things, and if that's the case (which I don't believe) then shit will certainly hit the fan.
kbin is also open source, and I'm happy that there are other projects with a similar vision as lemmy (the choice for PHP is an absolute mystery for me, but whatever floats your boat I guess). More (non-malicious) implementations always improve the fediverse in many ways.
It’s just a sliiiight bit more extreme than a small difference.
Like you're on the other side of the spectrum (i.e. Nazi)?
Doesn’t help. They’re still potentially malicious actors.
Yeah in that sense everyone is a potential malicious actor, but it's much less likely if all the code is publicly visible (open source), that this happens. Now especially as there are now a lot more people watching over the code and potentially future contributions (code review).
I trust these guys a lot more than most politicians or big companies (whether they're obviously authoritarian like in china, russia or "democratic" like in the USA). Transparency is a much more important factor than ideology/political views IMHO (e.g. they could publicly claim that they're rightwing, while they're tankies and vice versa).
But to me all your comments feel like rootless conspiracy anyway...
I don't understand...? I think I never explicitly run a method/function that is called copy (there isn't at least not for the trait
Copy)