Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PG
Posts
8
Comments
156
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Reducing the computational cost is what makes it complex... but why am I even discussing this here anyway, I was mocking the topic in the first place. Your disregard of the problems in the details is kinda amusing though, because that's probably the reason most recommender engines are as crap as they are.

  • It's always funny to me when someone talks about how awesome the tech behind recommender-systems is and what complex problems had to be solved to make it work but in the end it's still just absolute garbage.

  • What did you do to your phone's battery? I've got my phone for two and a half years and I still get decent runtime out of it.

    And I agree... if the only innovations these days involve adding new cameras and removing other common features (like headphone jacks...) I don't really see the point in upgrading.

  • Really depends where you are how feasible it is. Where I live we have a great public transport system. Most stations can be reached within 10 minutes when walking and there's a tram leaving the station every 10 minutes. So getting anywhere in the city is fairly quick and wait times are mininal in most cases.
    Travel outside the city and it's a whole different story and unfortunately there isn't really a good way to fix it. Just increasing the frequency of busses/trains isn't feasible because 90% of the rides will be empty at this point which makes no sense.