I agree, but evidently you need to put local in bold because it's never what people are thinking about in these nonlocal forums. But that's where third parties will come from unless it's some celebrity case, who will most likely coopt an existing party, resulting in the same two party system and a dramatically shifted politics that leaves half the country without ideological representation.
So much "if we can just ignore atrocity a little longer we can break through to a new reality where there is one fewer problem." Magical thinking at it's worst.
Alsup said using scraping tools is not inherently fraudulent, and giving social media companies free rein to decide how public data are used "risks the possible creation of information monopolies that would disserve the public interest."
The judge also said X was not entitled to "de facto copyright ownership" in copyrighted content that X's users made available to the public.
Just as a quick hope-it-works because it's easy, try drinking a glass of water with just a tiny amount of sugar and salt (like literally you should not be able to taste it, should just taste slightly fishy) before your nap.
I'm with the others on seeing a therapist, though, and first-round antidepressants have had huge positive effects in my personal experience, so it's not necessarily going to be this long mind warping journey that I think people are scared to start sometimes.
Yeah but he skipped adoption and the idea that parents can continue to support their daughter even if she's not a virgin. Teens getting married because one of them got pregnant is not the first thing I want people to think of. A teen marrying her statutory rapist should be even farther down the list.
Most of the media works for war. They want to see flags and make enemies. They don't want to report on people speaking up for basic rights in solidarity with other people against the machinery and "inevitably" of war.
Btw, I support the Guardian with a small monthly donation, and if you have the means I ask you to consider it
I'm not a therapist, so this is just a guess, but the "scared you off" comments and maybe the hints at depression could be seen as manipulative, especially when he really never wanted anything from the relationship beyond the online attention. He made her feel guilty for not spending more time and energy on him while exaggerating his own interest in her. Perhaps in his previous relationships the manipulation went further. Your friend needs to know she is not at all to blame for the end of this relationship. Nor is she dumb for caring about someone more than they cared about her: you can't always tell. But perhaps she will take from it the idea that she could ask for things that are important to her, like in-person contact or space to be doing something other than talking to him without being nagged, sooner in the process to be sure the other person is on the same page. Help her understand that whatever anxiety she felt to shore up his emotions should be at most a small part of their interaction. A relationship shouldn't feel like a tomagatchi pet.
He says critical frontline services — addressing the drug and alcohol abuse, gambling addiction and mental illness that underlie many domestic assaults — have been underfunded for decades.
If a male has a history of crimes of violence, of any form of domestic violence, coercion, physical, emotional, they should not have the presumption of bail," he said. "They should not get bail at all"
If offenders are released into the community while awaiting court appearances, Mr Hurley says they need [mental health] support too.
I've never seen a campus that was "closed to the public". The article probably means the UCs are on state-owned, not private, land. But I'm not sure that's true or makes any difference.
scheme to defraud the American people by approving and endorsing recipes submitted by Splenda to be lauded by the ADA as a healthy choice for people with diabetes, when the ADA knew that those recipes were contrary to the ADA’s guidelines and well-established and emerging scientific principles,” the complaint reads.
That's what the sentencing court called it I guess. She was arrested on terrorism charges for her clothing and for promoting women's rights on her social media, along with two female relatives, so the quotes are to show that it was not material or militant support, but expression of her views.
All they need is a third developer to divide up the project for them and design the interfaces