partial_accumen @ partial_accumen @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

4,233

Joined

2 yr. ago

You skipped the "mass market" part.

"I've exhausted my monthly ration allowance for McEnergy, so I'll have to pass today."

Instead of McCafe, it should be "McSoylent".

See now I'm curious how Sri Lanka's capital city got its name.

Listen, I get it that the Austin PD, as the example here, are doing their best. I get it that they aren't their own ultimate masters. All those points are made. I'm also GLAD that the APD are doing what they can within their rules to warn residents that these actions are happening. Yes thats good.

However, thats approach of harm reduction, not harm avoidance. The good folks of the APD are being used as tools to carry out the harm though. They may not want to, but they are. Is anyone claiming different? The state doesn't need to take over the APD to get the harm the state wants done. The question, and its a rhetorical one, is "where is the line?". At what point is it better to say "no, I won't do that" and be replaced by the state? I fear that day will come, but it needs to be examined now, before the state asks for something worse.

and play a lot of classic wow.

I'm wondering if you can tell me where I can find Mankrik's wife.

Those advancements were made possible by the Roadster, which was the true pioneering product that made EVs cool again. A car that was dreamed up and invented by Martin Eberhard, and would go on to be built by someone else that gave him the shittiest end of the most shit-covered stick there ever was.

All credit due to Eberhard and Tarpenning for the idea and some of the initial development of the BMS, but its not like they had a full car ready to sell and before Musk came in. Tesla was established as a company in 2003, Musk was brought in (with his money) in 2004. The first Roadster sold in 2008. Now stop making me say anything positive about Musk just to set the record straight. Its making me sick to talk about him positively after what he's become and how much harm he has caused human society.

It’s not rare for the first company to bring a product to market to not be the top dog once other companies get involved.

Except Tesla wasn't the first mass market EV. It wasn't even the second. The first would be the GM EV1 in 1997:

Many would argue that the EV1 doesn't count because it was on old technology. Fine then, the Nissan Leaf from 2009 then sporting its lithium battery:

Tesla Model S brought performance, range and styling that both of those were missing. However, we don't need Tesla anymore in the world if Musk is still benefiting from it.

Especially those times of year where you're in the office before the sun rises, and leave after it sets. Oh, and you work in a windowless room.

Nice humblebrag. You don't need to use the plural of pog in your post here when you only have a single mint condition Alf pog as your $2M asset.

I'm the last person to ever use the "both sides the same" but our side had some of that same problem during Obama's first term. Yes, key legislation was passed, but just barely and even some of those bills had some compromises.

Surprisingly, sliding a piece of paper with my Geocities URL wouldn't have the same effect.

I'm enjoying seeing my solar panels still producing electricity for the house at 8:55pm at night.

"The agencies were also instructed to consider other modern non-dollar assets such as Pokemon cards and Beanie Babies" /s

I'd trade Ukraine getting NATO membership if it means Hungary loses it.

A 3.5mm AUX jack takes up a significant amount of space just to connect a few wires that could be connected through USB-C anyway, that space could be used for a bigger battery.

The USB-C is unavailable because its being used to keep the phone powered. Is your solution to force everyone to carry yet another dongle in the form of a splitter?

You misunderstood. I don’t mean that the state or the feds will send their own people. I mean that they will literally take the police control away from the city government.

If they already have the local police doing their dirty work, haven't they already effectively done that?

If they do not comply, the state and federal government will step in.

So the defense is, to avoid having state and federal jackboots come in, the only solution is to put on jackboots yourself and become part of the problem?

I don't disagree with most of your thoughts above, but I'm not seeing a discussion of the merits or detriments of arguing in bad faith. A necessary component of bad faith arguing is the knowledge that you don't actually hold that opinion that you're defending even while claiming you do. After your first sentence in your text above you're speaking to actual beliefs that the person holds, which wouldn't be bad faith.

But I see what you are saying. It’s different and they will have to adapt.

The organization adapting may mean they simply exit that line of business if the costs/risks of training for the required staff it too high.