The Canadian folks are slightly more likely to let you pass than their counterparts on the other side, but unfortunately it's not the Canadians you'll reach first.
My guess is that they could do that, but eventually doing so would be called out as pointless time wasting and be disallowed.
I can see a directive going out that any participants are to be barred from participating in anything at all. Even if there's some legislative rule that says they can't be, because we all know how the new administration feels about old legislation. And then actual, literal guards will be brought in to keep those people out.
And maybe all others in the same political party "just in case they decide to try the same thing".
TBH, the Trumpists are probably looking for any excuse to do just that.
It had a faux URL bar at the top of both the left and right frame and used a little JavaScript to turn each side into its own functioning browser window. This was long before browser tabs were a mainstream thing. At the time, relatively small 4:3 or 5:4 ratio monitors were the norm, and I couldn't bear the skinny page rendering at each side, so I gave it up as a failed experiment.
And yes I did open it inside itself. The loaded pages were even more ridiculously skinny.
Frankly, I'm surprised that there are mods who dare to show any sort of defiance at all. I thought all the defiant ones left or decided they were OK with ring-kissing deference to Spez.
Have some of them grown backbones in the meantime?
Why did you cross out a word and then write a synonym right afterwards? I'd put an /s here, but well...
When politicians talk about "the country", whatever country they happen to be in charge of, they almost always mean the parts of the country that they think are important to the total exclusion of everything else. Or what they've been bribed to think of as important. Either way, that usually means "the rich, the important, and their agendas".
Likewise "the economy" is "the rich people's yacht fund".
Both sheep and wolves are religious but for different reasons. You seem to be saying that there are only wolves.
However, the wolves are dressed as sheep, and occasionally it is useful to tear off the sheepskins they hide under in order to save other animals that they also eat, if not also the sheep.
Has it, or were there always pockets of all kinds of schools of thought? It seemed that way to me at least until Spez decided money was more important than anything else and a good chunk of the left-leaners decided they'd be better off elsewhere.
That's not a pejorative, by the way. I'm a left-leaner. And I, well, left.
If God (or Allah if you prefer that name) is so angry about blasphemy, why does He risk letting fallible humans take care of the problem?
Simply cause the blasphemer to drop dead. Then the faithful can clean up the aftermath if they wish to appear faithful, because it is less important how that is handled.
Is this comment blasphemous? We'll see if I drop dead.
The brain reaches full maturity around 25. Some parts of the brain stop developing long before then but the pre-frontal cortex is an exceptionally slow developer. It's responsible for cognitive control: self-regulation both internally and externally.
Basically if you don't learn behavioural regulation by the age of 25, it's going to be harder to unlearn those habits afterwards. This is often seen in people who constantly make poor life choices and don't seem to be able to stop, or people with poor emotional control.
If the British civil service, even operating under previous administrations, can put together a multi-functioning government domain that runs reasonably well without JavaScript, there's no reason Google can't continue to do the same with a ducking web search.
The former works better with JavaScript, that's true, but it works OK without and that's the point.
Then again, the civil service were ordered to do it largely out of spite because the government didn't want to give the plebs any excuse for not being able to use the site.
I'm not sure how to get Google to lose the need for scripting in the same way.
For outdated, read "known stable". Unfortunately newer software very often has dependencies on even less well-tested new things that conflict with other pieces of software and their dependencies, on and on, and the whole thing cascades to either needing to be bleeding edge or very safe. Mint deliberately chooses the latter.
The memory leaks are there, I grant you, but you'll need an exceptionally long uptime to see any kind of problem from them. And it's not like restarting the DE is hard. And it takes less than a second.
As for slowness, I don't remember anything being annoyingly slow even when I was running Mint 17 from an honest-to-goodness HDD on a then 10+-year-old computer. 1st gen i7.
"Instagram" is, at least in my opinion, about as awkward as "Friendica" to say, and has millions of users. It wins marginally on spelling, but how often does the average user write or type the full name of a site anyway?
Fun fact: There's a common misconception that this would load the first program on a disk, but it actually loads the most recently loaded program from the disk. If the disk is detected as being freshly inserted (as determined by the 2-character identifier in the disk's directory header), that defaulted to the first program in the disk's directory.
Admittedly, most of the time that makes it a distinction without a difference, but if you'd loaded something else from the same disk first, and you then wanted to load the first in the directory, you would need to use LOAD":*",8,1 instead.
That extra colon is vaguely related to the colon in C:\ on Windows computers. A lone colon was taken as an abbreviation of 0:, because in Commodore DOS(es) the drive "letters" were numbers. Dual slot drives were possible and then the two slots were 0: and 1:.
"So what's the 8 for in the LOAD command?" you might ask; "Isn't that the drive "letter" "? No, that's the device number. Note that drives on the 8-bit Commodores were always external. The 8 was more like the drive's "IP address" on the serial bus.
"What about the ,1?" That meant to LOAD the program at the memory address specified by the program's header on the disk. Without that, the computer would ignore the header and try to load into BASIC memory.
The neat part about loading at any address meant that it could overwrite parts of zero-page where the computer kept pointers to important internal functions. Overwrite the right one of those and the computer could be convinced to jump to a routine in the program that had just loaded without the user needing to type RUN.
So, if you wanted to be i) certain of loading the first program in the directory of ii) the disk in the second slot of iii) a dual-slot drive on the serial bus identifying as device/address 9, and then iv) have the program load at its preferred memory location, you'd need to use LOAD"1:*",9,1
The number of people who found the need to type that command in earnest, even back in the heyday of Commodore, probably numbers in the low tens, but there it is.
Offtopic word choice nit-pick: "weary" means tired, "wary" means afraid. The first is related to "wear" as in "worn (out)" (or "wear and tear"), and the other is related to "aware" / "beware".
Since "wear" and "-ware" are generally pronounced the same by most modern speakers, it's easy to see how the confusion might arise, but in "weary", it's pronounced "weer" - "weery".
I think it's more like an uncanny valley phenomenon. Or it could be that humans are largely neotenous and other primates haven't developed that trait, so they remind us of old, or diseased members of our own species at a unconscious level.
Or it could be both. Strange hairy men that live in the woods? Avoidance response activated.
You seem to be familiar with Bash syntax. But others may not be.
If by this you mean that the Bash syntax for doing certain things is horrible and that it could be expressed more clearly in something else, then yes, I agree, otherwise I'm not sure this is a problem on the same level as others.
OP could pick any language and have the same problem. Except maybe Python, but even that strays into symbolic line noise once a project gets big enough.
Either way, comments can be helpful when strange constructs are used. There are comments in my own Bash scripts that say what a line is doing rather than just why precisely because of this.
But I think the main issue with Bash (and maybe other shells), is that it's parsed and run line by line. There's nothing like a full script syntax check before the script is run, which most other languages provide as a bare minimum.
There can't be a comma missing from a motto which is itself entirely missing. They threw it in a ditch a few years ago. (I'll be honest, I thought it had to have been at least 10 years at this point, but Wikipedia says otherwise.)
The Canadian folks are slightly more likely to let you pass than their counterparts on the other side, but unfortunately it's not the Canadians you'll reach first.