Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)OZ
Posts
3
Comments
423
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • My assumption is that because “the state claimed the rights” for that specific book makes me think this is a special case in their laws

    Can a US state or the federal government claim the right to someone else’s writing?

  • I haven’t looked that closely at laptop CPUs

    My guess would be partially because there are fewer possible interfaces, and they’re directly connecting the CPU to a separate Ethernet/WiFi MAC, USB hub controller, and audio DSP rather than having a separate chipset arbitrating who’s talking to the CPU and doing some of those functions?

  • For most intents and purposes

    SoC is from the embedded system development world - as more and more coprocessors were being put into the same chip to consolidate board space and power efficiency, it wasn’t “just” a cpu - it had the CPUs, GPUs, DSPs, and other coprocessors in one

    x86 has moved a lot closer to this architecture over the years, but you still generally have a separate chipset controller on the motherboard the CPU interfaces with

  • I wonder if development has actually accelerated, or if this is just a change in the approach to the release/versioning process

    Both.

    Development has increased, but you should use your comparison from the last 2.6 release.

    It stayed on 2.6.y for 8 years - that was where it got stable enough that there wasn’t some major milestone to use as a new marker for its update number

    There are cool new features, but if it followed the old versioning scheme, we’d still be on 2.6 because it hasn’t (intentionally) broken the API between the kernel and userspace

  • Wait. He lost a finger or toe???

    Edit: more seriously it’s been since 3.0 after being on 2.6 forever

    there are no special landmark features or incompatibilities related to the version number change, it's simply a way to drop an inconvenient numbering system

    It used to only get bumped after a major new feature update, but it was stable enough at 2.6 that it got stuck there for 8 years, so he switched to a different update number

  • I’m so curious to see how a Qualcomm gambit plays out for Microsoft.

    With the ethos at Qualcomm being support a chip for 1 year, then move on, I have trouble believing they’ll update the drivers for a major windows release

    Google browbeat them for nearly 10 years, and then ended up going with the majority Samsung designed chip called Tensor just to compete against Apple in years of updates

  • I mentioned above, but it definitely tried to make absolutely sure by requiring the exact string

    “Yes, do as I say!”

    With punctuation and capitalization required.

    They’ve even tried to add more protections after the video to make sure that’s what you meant to do