ozymandias117 @ ozymandias117 @lemmy.world

Posts

3

Comments

423

Joined

2 yr. ago

And they’re allowed to start doing it again in 5 years

block third-party cookies within Incognito mode for five years

Even in open source, responsible disclosure is generally possible.

See, e.g. Spectre/Meltdown, where they worked privately with high level Linux Kernel developers for months to have patches ready on all supported branches before they made the vulnerability public

I’d assume they’d just be green

Apple hasn’t agreed to implement RCS encryption, but maybe they will anyway

I keep getting emails from Teams saying I missed a message I’d read three hours ago

Section 1, 1, 3, g, C says “This section does not: Apply to: A vehicle…”

So, probably not

Yeah, my calico is super careful to never extend her claws when playing with me, but she will get her claws in her toys and just look at me or flail wildly until it flys away, even with her nails trimmed 😂

Chromium has worked on ARM since at least 2014

It’s just that they’re releasing a Windows compiled binary

Seems like a continuation of the sad state of affairs for ARM chips. Most of the allowed chips are ARM based, and most companies making ARM chips never update their kernels

Professionally, we’ve only used Wayland in our products since 2015

Personally, I switched all my home computers to Wayland in 2021

If you sell more than 1 million, it breaks even at apps that cost $2.75, so if it’s less than $2.75 the developer is making less on the epic store

If you sell less than 1 million copies, it’s 3% less than the App Store, and only works in the EU

All with Epic who’s traditionally not been keen on multiplatform support… it seems like a hard sell to me

At a high level, microkernels push as much as possible into userspace, and monolithic kernels keep drivers in kernel space

There are arguments for each e.g. a buggy driver can’t write into the memory space of another driver as easily in a micro kernel, however it’s running in the same security level as userspace code. People will make arguments for both sides of which is more secure

Monolithic kernels also tended to be more performant at the time, as you didn’t have to context switch between ring 0 and ring 1 in the CPU to perform driver calls - we also regularly share memory directly between drivers

These days pretty much all kernels have moved to a hybrid kernel, as neither a truly monolithic kernel nor a truly micro kernel works outside of theoretical debates

GKI will still limit you to Google’s fork of the kernel

Thanks for the in depth explanation.

When I’m using it from my work laptop to work’s server to access internal sites, it feels very client -> server.

When they said peer to peer, I was worried I was somehow also exposing my personal devices to work’s network

I didn’t realize there were so many other ways to set it up

That was my assumption, but the way it was stated, I wanted to clarify there wasn’t something special about WireGuard in the way people tend to mean peer to peer

Do you mean it’s fully bidirectional?

E.g. connecting to the WireGuard “server” my work set up allows them full access to my internal network?

I would have assumed I would need to set some sort of reverse routing in that case

If I’m not authorized to use those keys, how do I use Switchy?

I guess all Nintendo games are illegal to play by that argument, even with their console

If you like Alan Tudyk and are okay with mild horror, Tucker and Dale vs. Evil is one that I loved going into without any spoilers

Google blocking RCS after their complaints about Apple not supporting their standard is really funny, but why CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 in this case?

The Google Messages app is Google Proprietary as is their server implementation for RCS

Yeah, it’s much less convenient. I prefer TOTP, but I will pick HOTP over Cisco Duo’s proprietary implementation that I can’t use without their specific app if those are my only options