Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)WI
Posts
1
Comments
260
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I don't understand what happened with this game...

    My bothers and I played it quite early on and it was fine. We didn't stick with it or anything. Just another spot to play together. No one was talking about it or anything.

    Then like a year later everyone is going nuts about it. We see it pop-up everywhere.

  • Kind of... It's like infinite automatic save states. At least that's a good way to explain it, but the streaming thing they mention is more accurate. Nope like those flashback rewinds in racing games.

    I was underwhelmed at first and wanted to be snippy cus fuck patenting game mechanics, but it really is a complex and interesting feature they want to develop It should just not be patented.

  • Apparently it is in some motorsports. I dunno which ones but a quick search had mention of sensors and stuff.

    It really should be automated and strict AF. Should be akin to of it was gravel on the other side of the line.

  • This is exactly what I was thinking. Can make it as big as you want and no need to dig out the earth. Just a few "acceleration rings" and then the detector. I guess if it were feasible right now we'd be doing that though.

  • Give us a spec race so we can compare drivers on even footing.

    Or better yet have them race a car that can be rented at that track or locally so that fans can try their hands at "racing against" f1 drivers later with the same vehicle at the same tracks

  • The public voted with their purchases and this is what they wanted.

    Eventually most products settle into a baseline normal and innovation slows dramatically. It's not just phones that do this.

    There are plenty of phones out there that are weird and different but most people ignore them and they don't get the same attention. Think rog phones, flip and fold phones, fair phone, sony's camera focused phones no one wants to buy.

    Not too mention this list is for what you should buy, which is really the word experimental phone.

    It's a strange mentality that almost everyone time phone are brought up people so for absolute innovation. A full on game changer. Most of these already do exactly what we want incredibly well. There isn't much room for a game changer. Innovations will be less dramatic, more subtle.

    No one is going to buy a round phone, or a squiggly phone, and curved screen edges or curved phones never did well. So rectangular it is.

    Enthusiast features rarely stick around cus most people don't need those features or the features get rolled into something else. Headphones jacks and HDMI and so on can ask be integrated into USB C and for most that's good enough.