Skip Navigation

Posts
2
Comments
521
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Why do we need to argue which is better? In some places, beautification isn't really practical, but you can still stick these around. They don't look hard to install or uninstall, unlike trees.

    I would hate to see a tree actually replaced by one these. But no one but the meme is saying that is the plan.

  • I read that assembly instruction set provided. It doesn't look like any architecture I've ever seen.

  • Instead they just have hundreds divided by 5.

  • Unless you're looking for a wave-profile marker, in which case Tenacity/Audacity would help.

  • Audacity has telemetry; Tenacity is a fork without it.

    Source: I'm just learning this elsewhere in this thread.

  • That ain't why that light isn't blinking.

  • What happens the worst that can happen when you give your DNA to a privite company? Delta Airlines will frame you for murder.

  • Goodness, gracious, fork bomb in bash

  • Come to think of it, just who are these people who would busy themselves submitting frivolous reports an ominous orb? Could it be Jan? Jan, who takes it upon themselves to scold the children for looking at the solar eclipse? What else don't you want us to see, Jan?

  • There have been reports of a large black orb near the dog park. Ignore them. There is no orb. Nor is there a dog park. Besides, mysterious, humming orbs are nothing to worry about anyway. So why are you bothered by these reports? And now, the weather:

  • But is the joke that it will hum because that feature is money well spent, or because a large orb just does because of science, or because it just does and no one knows why?

  • less crazy than you might think

    Using a planet for a 3d printer's nozzle still sounds pretty crazy.

  • Sounds like it's time to buy a bunch of random cherry switches and randomize them across my keyboard.....

    And rotate them. While I don't plan to waste my energy, having hot swap sockets and swapping a few around should thwart the attack. You would have to do it frequently enough that relevant training data gets wasted before it's useful. I'm pretty paranoid, but not that much.

    I'll just consider it good security hygiene to get a new keyboard often :)

  • As far as I know, nothing about AI entered into arguments. No precedents regarding AI could have been set here. Therefore, this case wasn't about AI per se.

    I did bring it up as relevant because, as you say, AI is just an over-hyped black box. But that's my opinion, with no case law to cite (ianal). So to say that a court would or should feel that AI and fancy photoediting is the same thing is misleading. I know that wasn't your point, but it was part of mine.

  • As it usually does. But the court's ineptitude should favor the defense. It shouldn't be an arrow in a prosecutor's quiver, at least.

  • This was important in the Kyle Rittenhouse case. The zoom resolution was interpolated by software. It wasn't AI per se, but the fact that a jury couldn't be relied upon to understand a black box algorithm and its possible artifacts, the zoomed video was disallowed.

    (this in no way implies that I agree with the court.)

  • When Blackburn said again she wanted to talk, Cotton interjected, “Now I guess Sen. Durbin is not going to allow women to speak either. I thought that was sacrosanct in your party!”

    Man, they thoroughly do not understand equality.