Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)OO
Posts
0
Comments
367
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Either way, assuming I can find a large stick or rock, I'd have enough patience to do a manual physical uninstall and get back to my solitude. So I think I'd be pretty ambivalent.
    I guess smashing the shit out of windows would be slightly more satisfying - but that's not really the main reason I'm alone in the woods.

    And yes - before you ask the obvious follow-up - I have smashed the shit out of a thinkpad in the past, they're not as tough as people say they are; it's mostly false bravado. Don't be afraid to stand up to the bully (ymmv).

  • In rural Scotland (at least in Fife , Perth +Kinross) I noticed a lot of
    60mph-40mph - 20mph - 40mph-60
    sort of slow down buffer zone type things around villages.

    Much better than 60 - 30-60 we normally have in England.
    And noticeably quieter too.

    I hope they carry on with that.
    I think Wales did 20mph in all rural villages.

    Fuck England.

  • As i understand it it (somewhere between barely and not at all) the idea is not that It's "expanding" in the sense of a balloon inflating into the space around it.
    Its more stretching internally.

    So the distance (or time it would take at constant speed) between any 2 points is geting bigger.
    You could maybe also say it'd take more energy to move between the points in a set time.

    There's probably nothing outside, but the distances inside get longer.

    It's probably something to go with gravity, momentum and entropy. The actual concept of "distance" between things might not be what we think.

    But all these theories give rise to the concet of large amounts ob unobserved 'dark' mattter and evergy, so the actual basis of currently observable fact (i.e. energy / mass) is a small fraction of what is needed for these theories to work.

  • widdows 2000 was the pinnacle for me, beat XP until i wanted to go to 64 bit.

    Apart from having 64-bit, XP was a step back; even if I don't count the fucking dog thing.
    XP was a fair bit harder to de-bloat than win 2000 and they were hell-bent on forcing internet exploder on the world.

    XP was also at a time when Linux was becoming pretty easily usable and mac osx was impressive too - I remember using those imac coloured egg things at university in 2000. They were good apart from the mouse, and ran MS office pretty well.
    StarOffice was already better than MS-Word at dealing with .doc format across versions.
    and ancient version of Wordperfect were miles better for WP anyway ("reveal codes").

    windows XP was already down to gaming, adobe and CAD/other specialist apps, plus maybe MS Excel that just weren't as good or not available on linux.