Skip Navigation

User banner
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)OI
Posts
59
Comments
2,482
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • streamers were harassed, assaulted, doxed, stalked, and shut out from protests because they were creating evidence that was used to prosecute protesters doing crime.

    Yeah I saw some streamers get in to trouble with some specific groups of protestors for that reason, but didn't see it very often on the streams I was watching. I also listened to some interviews with Portland protestors on the Uprising podcast who felt that was a bit excessive, so didn't think it was particularly widespread.

  • Critics warn that this media-driven enforcement strategy risks trivializing serious legal processes and may ultimately erode trust in government institutions and community relations.

    Trump admin: Ah, so we're meeting both our primary and secondary priorities.

  • And that's the reason for my comment.

    We're already at the point where if we go one hair further we never get another election. I'm not 100% sure we aren't already past that point.

    I've chased Dems as they've run right for voters, with the implied promise that if only they had control they'd be pulling some things in the other direction, for multiple decades. I have supported and agreed with the folks who have pointed out that during their only short period of real control they did manage to get the ACA (and probably other things I'm forgetting) passed.

    They need another strategy than "we're going to chase the less crazy R voters" if they want my vote again. They need a strategy other than "follow us to the right and we promise we'll pull left when we can."

    Because events like this (and I well know there are many more), combined with how aggressively Kamala chased R voters, to the detriment of campaigning for D votes, make me feel that the only people who ever thought they had an intent to let progressive or even non-geriatric voices hold power were the idiots like me who kept voting for them.

    I'm only going to get Charlie Browned so many times, and 2024 showed me exactly how many times.

  • As a non Democrat, why would Democrats try to pull away republicans when republicans have been playing politics like a team game?

    No disagreement from me.

    Build your own damn team and give them a reason to be on your team.

    Yep

    Biden and Harris only got my votes because Trump has shown himself to be a piece of shit and Republicans are either throwing a blind eye or playing along in his game or Nazi.

    Yep. But we can't sink any lower, so that was the last time. If we get another election, they need to inspire me with something better than just being less conservative than the Nazi party.

  • You watch. They will double down on trying to peel away Republicans.

    This was my last vote for "not as bad as Trump." They need to sit down with the few progressives they've allowed to force their way into the party and bring me a platform I can feel good about. Step one of that is going to be not continuing the rightward slide of the party.

    This was already as bad an election outcome as I could possibly imagine, DNC. If we have an actual framework for free elections still in existence for the next one, I'm not going to vote for what I hope and think you might do if you can suck up to enough conservatives to get you into the whitehouse. You need to come with a platform that's going to excite me.

  • Sure. Like anyone at all believes AOC or Bernie is going to flip to R.

    After I replied to you I read the rest of the discussion and saw how absolutely willing you are to be a jerk about it, and how absolutely unwilling you were to consider any other point of view, so you actually needn't have replied, and had I seen that first I would not have commented.

  • I frequent a bagel place that automatically adds a fairly hefty (not THAT hefty) tip when you pre-order online for in-store pickup.

    If not for the fact that they are by far the best place to go for bagels in my area (we have few choices), that alone would stop me from ordering.

    Their bagels are good, and I'm not above tipping at a bagel place. But their prices are already very high for a bagel place (they know what they got), they do brisk business, and they should damn well be paying their employees more rather than trying to sneak a 25% tip into every online order. It doesn't even present it as in OP - it's just there in the itemization in the end and you need to manually edit it out before ordering.

    Edt - oh and if real, I ain't never going back to the place in OP after seeing that one time.

  • .ml replaces certain words with "removed"

    In this case it seems to have been this term.

    The "r" word will be removed too.

    I haven't noticed what the others are. I swear fairly often and those haven't been removed. I would guess only things that are slurs etc.

    Edit: It was removed from my link as well. LOL. Look up "gap in suit of armor" if you haven't figured it out already. Kinda ironically, when it's used as a slur it's against chinese people.

  • The thing is, I think that might be out of the frying pan and into the fryer at this point.

    Vance is cooler under pressure in interviews and generally more coherent sounding. I think he does a far better job of saying ridiculous unreasonable things with a convincing tone of voice and demeanor than does Trump.

    If Trump has one too many cheeseburgers tomorrow, then we've got young, clean-cut, smooth talking first-term President Vance to worry about, and I bet he won't be threatened by the attention Musk gets as long he he gets his cut. (Hell, I'm not even sure having to take over for Trump in that circumstance would count as his first term.)