Nutomic @ nutomic @lemmy.ml

Lemmy Lead Developer and father of two children.

---

Read more

Posts

111

Comments

903

Joined

6 yr. ago

Moderating

---

Its best if you improve the existing site, that way you dont have to worry about hosting, or directing users to your new site.

I dont think its a good idea to give money to Google or Bing for advertising. It would make Lemmy appear like a commercial project and give false expectations. And we barely have enough money for development so in my opinion money its better to donate. However if you have money and want to spend it on advertising, nothing is stopping you from doing that.

Are you referring to join-lemmy.org? It has a randomized order for the instances, so usually smaller ones are near the top.

Instance topics are defined here: https://github.com/LemmyNet/joinlemmy-site/blob/main/src/shared/components/instances-definitions.ts#L103

I do, although the sections in Mordor are a bit tedious to get through. But its worth it for all the details that were left out of the movies.

Like I said you're welcome to make pull requests. Lemmy is not a corporation employing multiple designers, but an open source project run by volunteers. So if you want to see something done, it's best to do it yourself.

Who gets to decide which instances match that description? Everyone will come up with a slightly different list.

Pull request welcome!

https://github.com/LemmyNet/joinlemmy-translations/blob/2ad0b3323f7a5c8b65fa62e3c06e7bf36ae8f233/translations/en.json

You're welcome to improve the text. That said the site is in large part aimed at instance admins and technical people. For normal users it's better to link them directly to a specific instance.

Happy to see that the Peertube embed is working now (Lemmy 0.19.9)

You guys had very bad luck with the database, but other instances didn't have such problems.

Exactly it seems most people here still didn't realize that this is an open source project run by volunteers, not a corporation with countless employees and a profit motive. If people want something to get done then it's best they start doing it themselves.

Lemmy.world is excluded because it represents more than 30% of all active Lemmy users, thats too much. And yes the list is somewhat randomized so that you get different instances at the top each time. You could store the order in a cookie to keep it consistent for each user. And you are welcome to improve all this.

A/B testing is not really possible in a decentralized system like this, it would require all instance admins to collaborate for collecting results, and would make deployment much more complicated. Not to forget that there simply arent enough development resources to implement it. That said if you see anything that can be improved, you're welcome to make a pull request. Its standard Typescript wit TailwindCSS and Inferno, nothing complicated.

Thats funny, Im also 32 and completely happy with the default Lemmy UI. Definitely wouldnt use something like new Reddit. But the good thing is that there are so many different choices, and its possible to create instances with a different default UI.

Pull requests are more than welcome to improve the site. Its basic Typescript, TailwindCSS and Inferno.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/joinlemmy-site

You can also make changes to the documentation, its markdown just like Lemmy itself. So if you would write something differently then open a pull request and change it!

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-docs

No we dont have any benchmarking infrastructure. Maybe one of the instance admins will report some results later.

Sorry I said it wrong, reports do federate but only in a limited way. Particularly if you moderate a remote community you wont see the reports. Also the action of resolving a report is currently not federated at all. Both of these are fixed with the PR above.

This sounds like the same problem you reported before. Only thing I can think of is to get in contact with the maintainer of lemmy-cross-toolchains

I implemented reports federation recently, in current versions it is not available at all. So you may have to wait until version 1.0, though @MrKaplan mentioned that he plans to backport it to 0.19.x

Edit: Nevermind I was talking nonsense. Reports do federate, but only in a limited way. Particularly if you moderate a remote community you wont see the reports. Also the action of resolving a report is currently not federated at all. Both of these are fixed with the PR above.