That did help, thanks.
But in another note, when I rotated back after finishing the thread, it was worse than before, with no comment hierarchy visible at all. I had to refresh to get it back.
“You can have a vice-president that is outstanding in every way, and I think JD is, I think all of them would have been, but you’re not voting that way. You’re voting for the president. You’re voting for me.”
As the oldest presidential candidate in American history, I think it's entirely reasonable to consider the non-trivial chance that his second may need to step in at some point.
That's a good and interesting catch, and while I did engage in the discussion do agree that it's probably best to reserve any sense of certainty until the FBI shares their findings.
The ascender on that "T" is at the same height as the other capital letters, so maybe they intended it to also serve as a crucifix to really tie the whole scene together? ;)
If a president cannot be charged with crime other than through impeachment:
Presidency changes hands at noon on January 20th following election.
Outgoing president murders incoming president minutes before inauguration.
No path for impeachment, therefore get off Scott-free.
So would that mean that California has actually gotten fitter in that period of time, since it appears to be the only state with no visible change? (Edit: Michigan as well)
Here's the last comment in the thread I was following, just in case it's helpful.