numberfour002 @ numberfour002 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

282

Joined

2 yr. ago

I've given you sunshine.

I've given you dirt.

You've given me nothin'

but heartache and hurt!

I'm beggin' you sweetly.

I'm down on my knees.

Oh please,

Grow protein!!!!

You should probably spend a bit more time avoiding xylitol then, if that's your reasoning. Sorbitol isn't toxic to dogs for the most part. Xylitol on the other hand is.

Appears to be a thicc chunk of moistandtite.

I prefer to believe that I'm uniquely nutritious and irresistibly sweet. And I probably acquired some kind of special powers from my cicada bite that enable me to make anything I touch suck.

The birb is an Eclectus parrot. I've got a totally different perspective and opinion than some of the other comments you received. And that opinion is: They make terrible pets and are not really suited for the general public.

The basics of their care (food, water, shelter, medical treatment, cleaning, maintenance) are all pretty reasonable to accommodate.

Their psychological needs are a whole order of magnitude harder to provide, and can almost rival the time, attention, and energy needed for a young child. Depending on the age of the bird you adopt, you could be signing up for 20 - 30+ years of commitment to an animal that may ultimately not form a bond with you, is much more intelligent than a cat or dog in a lot of ways, and can pretty easily make your life nearly as miserable as its own. If they aren't happy, they will make sure that you aren't happy either, but keeping them happy can be a job in and of itself.

Now if you have experience with keeping similar birds in captivity, are well-educated on how much goes into their care, have lots of disposable income, and are fully prepared for the good and the bad, then you might do alright with one. But, if you're looking at them to be a "pet", then this is not a good option for you.

For some reason, I was thinking it was a few years more recent than 2011 the last time the Southern Brood emerged in my area. I have a memory of going for a hike in a wooded park, and there were so many of these cicadas that their individual calls just blended together into an almost ethereal low hum. Just didn't realize it was that long ago.

Since childhood, I've always thought cicadas were really cool critters. Their calls are the quintessential soundtrack of summer days for me.

I don't formally track things, but I do pay attention to when I first start noticing cicada calls each year. I had noticed that they have seemed to emerge later and later the past 4 or 5 years. In 2023, the first time I noticed any calls at all was near the end of June. Normally I start hearing them around the last week of May to the first week of June.

I also did not see as many cicada molts last year as normal, so I was thinking that it was a smaller emergence than typical. I wonder if it's related to the upcoming 13-year brood getting ready to emerge?

Final note: I went most of my life without knowing that cicadas can "bite". I mean, technically they can't bite because their mouth parts are needle-like, but I found out that they will sometimes jab a human.

One year I had a Disney princess moment where a cicada landed on my finger while I was outside working in the yard. I just left it to do its thing, because again I think they're cool and never had issues handling them before. Several minutes went by, and then I felt a poke in the general area of the cicada -- and then realized it must have mistaken me for a tree and it was trying to feed. I could see it lifting up a bit and making repeated attempts to stab its mouth into my finger. I guess I was the most poplar Disney princess that cicada had encountered that day. Fortunately it wasn't painful, but one of the jabs did break the skin and there was a small amount of blood.

Yes. The most important thing to know is that when life hands you a Lemmy, make Lemmyonade.

And now we await the hashtag posts all over the place. #itscoming #mastadon #mastapleasedon't #mastadontagsarecoming #tagsarecoming #hashtagsarecoming #hashhashhash #nowwewait #lemmymastadon

First she came for the sparrows, and I did not speak out because I am not a sparrow.

Heck, what keeps them [cows] from drinking the milk of their mother long term?

The mother, usually. But then eventually it comes down to a matter of logistics.

I'm not here just to be a contrarian, but I really don't fully agree with some of the hot takes in these comments. So here's my perspective:

I'm in a rural area and because of this type of funding, I have decent high speed internet. The same can be said for my neighbors, some of whom didn't have internet until very recently because the options weren't really viable or reliable.

I get that this is a wonderful opportunity to sling vitriol at the government AND businesses. I get that there were spectacular failures in the past. But the reality is, like usual, more nuanced than that.

A lot of this type of money has, and likely will be, used to support building infrastructure for rural areas that would otherwise not be economically viable for companies to provide that kind of service to. Living in a rural area, I'm not convinced that many/any people are going to change their vote to Biden because they suddenly have access to (or promises of future access to) fiber internet. I'm also not convinced that Biden and his administration would have any reasonable expectation otherwise.

Additionally, I'm sure some of this money will go to the big corporations and directly into the pockets of the top execs. However, it does provide work and jobs for regular "commoners" as well. It's also the case that the big players aren't always the ones getting that money. A lot of this type of money is going to replace copper infrastructure with fiber, and a lot of the work is being done by smaller / regional companies because they're the ones who have been operating these areas all these years while the big players focused on the most profitable areas with the higher returns on investment.

Of course, feel free to aimlessly hate on the entire system, but at least do so knowing that this type of thing IS helping real people and that if/when they see these types of comments, it's pretty clear that folks are being unrealistic and dogmatic.

While I agree that evolution would progress roughly the same way, I don’t think it would result in exactly the same people.

This implies that you think I was saying it would be the same people, but I actually said the exact same thing as you, just in different words: "it wouldn’t be the exact same people, living the exact same lives, at the exact same time as now."

With powerful people (like kings, emperors and their courts) being different, history would be different too

For sure, but from the timescale we're discussing, the whole of human history is literally just a tiny fraction, a blip, at the very end. And until very recently, you could even argue the vast majority of human history was almost entirely inconsequential.

Well, I don't think time travel backwards in this manner is possible, but if it is, it would have to operate under the laws of thermodynamics which means the energy (and maybe even some of the atoms) that was "transported back in time" would represent a paradox.

The energy and/or some of the atoms in you and the time machine were already somewhere in the past when dinosaurs roamed the earth. Which presents a paradox (and this is probably not even the only paradox), so how does the universe conserve energy in that situation?

Somehow the "original" atoms and energy that became you and the machine would need to be reconciled with the duplicates that suddenly turned up.

So maybe there's a mysterious process that obliterates energy? What would it be and how would it work? Would that be equivalent to the false vacuum that could fundamentally destroy the universe as we currently know it?

Or maybe there's nothing to actually stop duplication of energy and atoms and it's entirely feasible to go back in time. You take the time machine back, see some dinos from space, and you managed to otherwise not change a thing. That means in some dozens of million years, you and that machine will be sent back to exactly the same time and location again because nothing has changed. Bam, now you and that time machine are in triplicate. But, with nothing really changing, the same process will occur again and again. Does it reach a point where there's so much duplicated energy / matter that something fundamentally different has to happen? Would all those duplicate yous and time machines coalesce into a giant cosmic object that comes crashing down to the Earth like a giant asteroid, thus killing off most dinosaurs and paving the way for human evolution? Hmmm.

I don't believe that kind of time travel is possible. But, if it were possible, the odds of finding that exact individual (who probably didn't actually exist) at that exact time are so minuscule that for all practical purposes, it may as well be impossible. But, if that were also possible, it did happen, and that was the only thing that happened differently, then I'm thinking the most likely outcome is that evolution would pretty much continue on the same course, probably even with humans eventually evolving.

It's common to think of the evolutionary process in a more or less linear fashion that could theoretically be traced back to a figurative Adam and Eve, but the reality is, it's so much more messy and convoluted than that. Evolution is a culmination of many factors such as the environmental conditions and populations that exist during a given time frame. So even if there was one specific common ancestral individual who happened to live at the exact time the dinosaurs were alive, which that individual is not a thing that existed, there would almost certainly still be a population of others of the same species living in the same conditions -- so theoretically would still ultimately lead to the same evolutionary outcomes in most instances.

So, I think it's very possible people would still exist. But, it wouldn't be the exact same people, living the exact same lives, at the exact same time as now.

On the other hand, who is to say that the common ancestor hadn't already produced the offspring that specifically lead to you and I being born before it was eaten? Who's to say that individual getting scared and eaten wouldn't have happened anyway, regardless of whether you were there or not? Who's to say that wasn't actually the defining moment that ultimately resulted in the evolution of people (and you and I specifically)?

I dunno, this is all getting a little too timey-wimey for me.

"Wipe" is a bit of a stretch and a bit specific when it comes to animal behavior, but many animals do clean their food or clean their living quarters in a variety of ways.

In addition to the other examples already given, I'll toss Eusocial Insects into the ring. This includes groups like bees and ants that live collectively in colonies. For example, honeybees will clean their colony's comb to keep it free of debris. Leaf cutter ants depend on a specific type of fungus that they cultivate for food, and they spend a lot of effort keeping their farmed good nice and sanitary.

I'm wondering if there is a bit of misunderstanding or miscommunication going on here? I don't know the statement or the context, but my interpretation based on OPs title is that this person is implying ...

Registered Democrats will switch their party affiliation so that they can vote for Haley to be the Republican nominee for president.

The implication that enough Democrats will do this that it will affect the outcome is, how shall I put this nicely, wholly unsupported by data or reality. On the other hand, the intellectually dishonest types will actively seek examples of people doing this (or claiming to do it) and use that as "evidence" that it is happening on a wide scale.

The fact that some number of people will switch parties to vote in a primary is inevitable and happens every presidential election cycle and is not a tool used only by members of one party. You might as well predict that someone will get into a car accident in the USA in the next 24 hours.

Stranger even than a live armadillo in the anus?

OH MY GOD WHAT A COINCIDENCE? I ALSO HAVE MICROPLASTIC INSIDE OF ME AND APPARENTLY A LOT OF IT AS WELL.

I think I have Disney PTSD from a former friend/acquaintance who had an almost supernatural ability to make any conversation into a conversation about Disney. So, now I'm super sensitive about it. Would almost rather a conversation start with "Have you heard about our Lord and savior Jesus Christ" than anything that includes the word "Disney".

In the USA at least, any time you buy alcohol, tobacco, or any number of other random things that the retailer decides to flag as requiring ID, then you'll need assistance from a cashier. Random things include razor blades, compressed air, some herbal supplements, spray paint, butane torches, or any of dozens of other items. Any time you accidentally scan something twice, you'll need a cashier's assistance. Any time something rings up the wrong price or any time the UPC doesn't scan, you'll need a cashier's assistance. Also, if you're buying gift cards, you may need a cashier's assistance.

Also, different stores have different machines and different machines work better than others. Many places have ridiculously sensitive machines that freeze up if so much as a fruit fly farts on it. Some places use "AI cameras" to detect theft, which basically the algorithm for that seems to be "If (customer scanned something OR customer didn't scan something) then (theft, so freeze and call cashier for assistance)".

So, the frequency is highly variable. For some stores, I can usually manage to get by with almost never needing assistance. For others, it's practically every visit.