By not eating food that has already been bought and prepared you do not decrease demand.

perhaps

humans normally breath through their noses.

And both you and people arguing that it's 1 would be wrong.

This problem is stated ambiguously and implied multiplication sign between 2 and ( is often interpreted as having priority. This is all matter of convention.

this is called flexitarianism and is totally valid in terms of not wasting food and cohabitating in society. unfortunately some vegetarians would bully a person like you since ideological purity is more important than not wasting food to them

but I don’t understand the math of how to get that answer

There's four total outcomes of the problem:

Scenario 1: you originally pick the winning door (1/3) and don't switch (1/2), therefore winning. Probability = 1/6

Scenario 2: you originally pick the winning door (1/3) and did switch (1/2), therefore losing. Probability = 1/6

Scenario 3: you originally pick a losing door (2/3) and don't switch (1/2), therefore losing. Probability = 1/3

Scenario 4: you originally pick a losing door (2/3) and do switch (1/2), therefore winning. Probability = 1/3

Now consider scenarios 1 and 3 together, these two are when you don't switch. P(S1) is 1/6 and P(S3) is 1/3, meaning S3 is twice as likely than S1. So if you don't switch, you are twice as likely to lose. And now consider scenarios 2 and 4 together. P(S4) is 1/3 and P(S2) is 1/6, meaning if you switch you are twice as likely to win than to lose.

You can also consider this problem in terms of conditional probability like this:

P(win as long as no switch) = P(win and no switch) / P(no switch) = P(S1)/(1/2) = (1/6)/(1/2) = 2/6 = 1/3

P(win as long as switch) = P(win and switch) / P(switch) = P(S4)/(1/2) = (1/3)/(1/2) = 2/3

P(win as long as switch) > P(win as long as no switch)

No, by staying on your door you're relying on the 99/100 chance of originally picking the wrong door.

You can't have opinion on maths

yep

It's a secret -- otherwise the streaming services in question would immediately patch the vulnerability

Apparently American teenagers do and will straight up bully you if you have an Android.

It's interesting how AutoTLDR bot changed the spelling of his name

these are wet wipes to freshen ones hands before a meal. restaurants will often give these out with little warm water

I only have one account, but I will give it a go later

Junk mail is not a thing outside US. We do get flyers though, but usually sticking a piece of paper on your mailbox saying "no flyers" is enough to never get them.

green colored ketchup

the what?

Never heard of these two apps

Isn't he ChatGPT app merely a front end to an off-site service? Why the fuck would it deserve an award itself? The service, sure; but the app?!

Fairphone 4 was released in 2019.

Fairphone offers factory refurbished devices, but they are still ridiculously bad deal. A refurbished Fairphone 4 (a device couple of years old) sells for $30 less than a brand new one. Sure, you still get warranty, but it is a $600 second hand device after all.