NSRXN @ nsrxn @lemmy.dbzer0.com

About

---

Read more

Posts

6

Comments

666

Joined

7 mo. ago

looks like this comic is saying it's not working. do you have some evidence it is?

it's just a list of my feature requests

seems like this comic indicates it's not doing enough

it didn't work

have you tried that?

did you try that?

They betrayed America by allowing a felon rapist conman who incited an insurrection and illegally attempted to overturn an election to become our leader, and now we’re seeing the negative effects of that.

everyone who failed to stop it, including those who voted with you, allowed it to happen. and you are allowing it to continue. step up and stop it.

it's not actually clear how much of that land is exclusively for growing animal feed, and how much of that land is being attributed to animal feed, which is also used for human food. for instance, a soybean is only about 20% oil. about that much is used by humans. The other 80% of the soybean is a byproduct of pressing for oil called soy cake. that soy cake is fed to livestock, but if it weren't fed to livestock, it would be industrial waste. is 80% of soybean land use to grow food for livestock? no. 100% of it is used to grow food for people, and food for livestock. and we feed cottonseed to cattle, but cotton isn't grown for cottonseed: it's grown for textiles. is that land being attributed? I've read the article is carefully as I can, and it doesn't seem to make this nuance at all.

there is no such thing as an unbiased source

none of your arguments will hold water with the lived experience of most people. they don't want to see the disappointment in their grandma's eyes over something they don't believe, themselves, to be a just reason for turning down her cooking. they didn't see a problem with grabbing some food on their way to make the world a better place. your grandstanding is not only ineffective: it comes across as bizarre and unhinged.

I’m blocking you

oh thank god

You don’t argue in any sense of data or fact, just shitty little retorts amounting to nothing more than “no, actually”.

there's no data you've presented to discuss

you’re the worst, most bad faith debater I’ve ever had the displeasure of talking to

your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith

convenience isn’t a valid reason to do wrong

we've been over this: most people don't think it's wrong.

culture doesn’t permit amoral acts

we've been over this.

Plant based food is objectively cheaper

sometimes, for some people.

stick up for what’s right, don’t crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect

most people don't think eating meat is morally wrong.

just because it’s easier doesn’t mean it’s right.

i didnt say it's right. i said it's a reason people choose meat.

Culture is not an excuse for doing objectively amoral things.

i think you meant immoral. as it turns out, culture is a great reason to choose amoral actions, and most people think eating meat is amoral.

Any time meat is comparable, this is because of government subsidies.

this doesn't change the fact that, for some, in some situations, it is a better source of calories-per-dollar