notabot @ notabot @piefed.social

Posts

0

Comments

60

Joined

1 mo. ago

You've got this, just show her how attracted to her you are, tell her she's your sun and your moon, that she's all you think about, that the world seems dark without her.

These things are usually buried somewhere in the small print, and it might even have been in some "hey, look at this exciting new prek we git you" email from your employer when you/they joined the scheme. It might have been something like "Any items we provide to assist with member's physical therapy remain the property of

<evilcorp>

Just treat the tablet as what it was provided as, a way to access their app, and be ready to return it afterwards.

Been there. A word to the wise: never decided that the best way to avoid multiple walks to the kitchen is to fill a mug with espressos and then drink it at your desk. Colours start to make sounds, everything moves too slowly, you feel a sense of impending doom, and your heart makes a spirited attempt to leave your body.

The way he's sitting reminds me of the "I don't always ... but when I do I ..." meme.

Bear in mind that they already have your home address, as they sent the tablet to you, that address is geolocated, and anyone with a phobe passing near you will have enumerated any wifi networks and possibly bluetooth too and geolocated those.

They already know what devices are around you unless there's not been a phone within range since you got them.

You were sent the tablet in order to be able to access the the app they provide. I strongly suspect that it is actually a loan, and they will want it back when you are finished with it. Given that, you shouldn't even attempt to root it. Use it for what it is intended for, gain some benefit from that, hopefully get your massager, and return the tablet when you're finished with it.

Unless you deliberately give them more information, there's not much new they can gain about your environment from the tablet. What you do in the app is going to be much more valuable data to them as it'll give them information about you and your health that they could not gain any other way.

They're publishing articles that are completely false, which suggests failures are the writing and editorial levels, whether or nit they use an LLM. It's going to take a lot of high quality, accurate, articles to regain my trust.

If you've asked in a friendly way, without putting stress on her, and accepted the 'no' without making a fuss and in the same friendly way, it doesn't tend to cause difficulty in my experience.

It looks like the article was AI, it's been pulled from the site.

Blast. This sounded like really positive news, linux as an ecosystem desperately needs to revisit its init process choices, but there really doesn't seem to be any hint of it elsewhere. There is a rye that's written in rust and which has an init command rye init. I wonder if it's a case of an LLM latching on to that and just making up the rest?

I wish to end all wars

/turns into the letter s.

Yes, your Highness. Will you be needing any further artifacts aquired for safe keeping and preservation?

University is about a lot more than the piece of paper you get at the end. If it's of any real quality, and you are actually engaged with it, you'll be learning from experts in your chosen field, amongst engaged and eager peers, whilst also being exposed to different viewpoints on everything from what to have for lunch through the latest innovations in your field, and adjacent ones, to the geopolitical state of the world. The people you meet, and the connections you form can, and often do, form the bedrock of your working life from then on.

All of that does make the assumption that you actively engage with university life and those around you. Make friends in different subjects, seek out your professors during office hours and talk to them about their interests, join clubs, do stupid, but ultimately harmless things.

It also assumes you are attending a 'good' university, rather than a profit driven degree mill, and those might be harder to find in some places than others.

That would explain the slightly dazed look...

If you are just a user, in that a computer is just a tool you use, then you're right, there's comparatively little reason to be concerened or even know about the underlying details of the system. If you go further and start making changes to your system, or even building more complex systems, over time you will find yourself forming quite firm opinions about various parts of the underlying system, especially if you've had experience with other options.

Honestly, I'm not sure, I was looking at Devuan, but then noticed that Debian supported sysvinit natively so I went that route instead. I figure that sticking to the source distro was going to give me fewer headaches, and so far it's been plain sailing.

Debian, installed without systemd as per the wiki. So far I've not hit any issues, whilst I've recently ended up diving through both kernel and systemd code to find the root cause of an issue I was hitting on one server. I could have just bodged past it, but I wanted to actually understand what the issue was, and what else it was going to affect.

I recall reading about that research some time ago, thanks for reminding me of it.

I was perhaps being a bit slapdash referring to information being destroyed, as in the quantum sense, yes, it can be recovered. However the recovery posited in the paper is a theoretical simulation of the information that entered the blackhole, which, I suppose could be used as a direct analogy for the actual information that entered the black hole, or maybe somehow used to create an actual copy of it, but, as far as I can see, it also requires that the black hole completely evaporates to release all of the information. Without all of the information, the information you do have does not describe the initial state, as they put it in the article it is 'encrypted'.

Our initial discussion was about whether conciousness can be destroyed. Given that there is a period of time between information entering the black hole and having sufficient information back to create a simulation of it, and that conciousness arises from the detailed structure and working of our brains, I would say that a consciousness that falls into a black hole has, indeed been destroyed. Whether the mooted simulation means that said conciousness can be reconstructed at a future point is a different question, and rather resembles the Ship of Theseus question.

There also seem to be significant questions about the exact conclusions of the paper as it is very theoretical and based on a number of simplifying assumptions. I've tried to find the original paper, but it looks like it may be spread over several, and I really don't know where to start with sentences like 'We reformulate recent insights into black hole information in a manner emphasizing operationally-defined notions of entropy, Lorentz-signature descriptions, and asymptotically flat spacetimes. With the help of replica wormholes, we find that experiments of asymptotic observers are consistent with black holes as unitary quantum systems, with density of states given by the Bekenstein-Hawking formula.'

So, in summary, yes, information is not actually destroyed when if falls into a black hole, it's just mangled beyond recognition, entangled with all the other information that has, and will, enter the black hole, and can only be reconstructed by theoretically entangling all of the radiation the hole emits over it's entire lifetime with a suitable simulation!

Black holes are a good example of information destruction. Matter and energy fall into the gravity well, and eventually are reemited as Hawking radiation, but as far as current theories go, there's no way to reconstruct the information that made up the original matter or energy from that radiation.

Information isn't a "thing" but the relationship between, and exact quantum state of, things. Once that state is disrupted, the information is gone.

Information is destroyed all the time, conciousness is just information, and will cease to exist in a meaningful form when the structure of matter hosting it (your body, and in particular your brain) ceases to function in a way that supports that.

The energy that motivated your body and acted as signals in your brain will disipate. Your actual matter will stick around in one form or another. After all, we are all "star stuff", and given long enough, our "stuff" will return to the universe at large.

Well, that's a horrifying dystopia, well done.

"the kids won't see it as weird. they'll transition straight from their parents deciding their meals to corporations doing the same" is the bit that sold it for me. It's entirely plausible, corporations would live it, and I hate it.