Democratic Senator Says He Will Stall Trump Nominees Until USAID Is Back | Schatz said he would hold up Trump’s diplomatic confirmations
notabot @ notabot @lemm.ee Posts 2Comments 654Joined 2 yr. ago
notabot @ notabot @lemm.ee
Posts
2
Comments
654
Joined
2 yr. ago
That's not helping...
For media to endure, whether we're talking years or millenia, you need to answer three questions:
- What to record it on.
- Where to store it.
- How to encode it.
The first is, perhaps, the easiest to answer, we have cave paintings from the stone age, velum and parchment that have lasted thousands of years, clay tablets that have similarly endured and various other historical artifacts that could be considered 'media'. Alternatively, there are more modern techniques, such as etching into plates of non-coroding metal or other substances, or encoding in stable chemical structures such as DNA. Each approach has different benefits, but largely depends on the second question, where to store it?
Storing the media is the next question, and the answer is going to depend on both what media you've chosen and how long you want it to last. Somewhere dry, solid and geologically stable probably makes the most sense, but it also needs to be accessible to those you hope will find the information later. The Voyager disks are a good example of long term storage that will probably outlast the human race, but they're not exactly handy to retrieve. The same goes for the various efforts to send archives to the moon; they're more for posterity than use. Finding, or digging, a tunnel in a bedrock type mountain, far above current, or expected, sea levels is probably a good bet. Don't forget to record how to find the repository, and find a way to keep that knowledge available. That could be a record in another repository, or maybe engineered into the landscape such that signs point to it.
The last question is how to encode the information. If you're aiming to store the information for an extreme duration, you have to assume the entity finding it will have little or no cultural, technological or language connection with you. Pictures may work, we've learnt a lot from stone-age cave paintings and Egyptian tomb paintings, but they can only convey so much. For textual information you're probably going to need multiple layers, the first being illustrated and readable without special equipment or techniques, and showing how to access the latter layers. The next layer should include information about how to read the rest of the layers (do you need magnification? If so, how do you do that? Have you included a lens that could be used? Do you need special illumination, or other techniques? How should the reader do that?), information about the language(s) used (perhaps a Rosetta Stone type artifact to help translate if they know any of the languages) and information about things like the units used (how long actually is a metre? What is a second?). The next layer would explain any envoding used for the rest of the information. If it's binary stored as pits engraved in stone, or DNA base pairs, or holographically stored in metal plates, how do you extract the data, and how do you convert the naughts and ones to text for example. You must assume the entity processing this has no common base with you to work from, so everythis must be explained in detail. Finally you can store the information you actually wanted to store in the final layer.
These concerns hold whether you're trying to store information for millenia or just a few decades. For instance, if I handed you an 8" floppy disk containing a Wordstar file, could you read it without more information? Even once you've found an appropriate drive (very rare now-a-days) and a machine that can use it (likewise) you need to hope the disk has been stored appropriately.
If you're trying to store information to be accessible to humans over a timespan of no more than a few lifetimes you'll probably be better served by arranging for it to be reencoded and tranferred to new, modern, media every few years.
Like a sea turtle trying to get up on a raft.
What a mental image. Brain bleach, stat, please.
They already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don't know, but I'd assumed not.
I'm sure he could and would. All he'd need to do is dictate that X is the only payment provider all government departments may use to improve 'efficiency'.
Would the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
Consider the presidential election. A simple binary choice was presented to the electorate; the Democrat candidate versus the Republican candidate. There were no other possible results. It was extremely clear to anyone who wasn't already MAGA levels of devoted to the Republicans, that the Republican candidate would do far worse things than the Democrat candidate, thus there were functionally only two actions you could take: vote for the democrat candidate or vote against the democrat candidate. Abstaining, voting third party, or otherwise not voting democrat had exactly the same result as directly voting for the republican candidate, namely increasing their odds of winning.
Neither candidate should have been standing, both parties should have had free, fair and open primaries, and the whole situation stank, but that was the situation when the polls opened, and voters needed to act accordingly. As I said, the republican propaganda team was in overdrive and successfully fooled a large enough portion of the electorate into thinking of the election as a referendum on the democrats, rather than a choice between democrat and republican, and got them to think along the lines you've outlined above. That was enough to shift the election in favour of the republicans, and leave us in the situation we're in now.
The same dynamic played out all the way down the ticket, giving what is likely to be a catastrophic result for a vast number of people. The argument that it's not the voters' fault is disingenuous; no-one was holding gun to their heads when they voted. Yes, the amount of disinformation and propaganda they experienced was extreme, but that does not absolve anyone of their personal responsibility. The fact that neither party treated the electorate with any respect, likewise, does not absolve anyone of their responsibility, nor did it change the nature of the election. The trick was played on voters by the republicans, getting them to think, and say, that the democrats weren't good enough without considering what the alternative was.
As you say, they want people fighting amongst themselves, and it would certainly be best to acknowledge that the election has passed, and the situation is as it stands. The republicans have a clean sweep of every branch of federal government and many state ones too, and are wasting no time in implementing their worst and more damaging policies as quickly and ruthlessly as they can. Now we have to work out how to protect the vulnerable, slow the oncoming tide of fascism and find a way to start bringing people back together again. The next major round of elections should be in two years, and present an opportunity to turn, or at least, slow the tide that threatens to wash away the USA. Between now and then a lot has to change, but it's doable, even if the parties themselves do not, but it will take people looking past the obvious tricks and understanding that they usually, unfortunately, only have two options in an election, and now-a-days one is much, much worse than the other.
Nope. The question was which of the two candidates, Democrat or Republucan, would be the best (or least bad, if you will) in each of the elections, from President down.
Because the Republican propaganda machine managed to convince enough people this was a referendum on the Democrats, the Republicans won at every level.
Threads like that explain a lot about the state of the world.
I heard you like to irradiate things, so I put a nuke in your nuke, so you can irradiate while you irradiate.
A project Pluto powered missile really would be the ultimate 'screw you', it could fly around enemy territory for days or more, spewing radioactive exhaust, launching warheads as it went, before finally hitting a target. Shoot it down and you have a nuclear mess, don't and you have a wider nuclear mess.
it's just the B-52 but the bomb bay doors may fall off during flight.
Cunning. Extra munitions built into the airframe and deployable with minimal manual intervention. We'll take 50.
My god, is systemd ever a piece of crap. Coupled with ‘consistent[ha!] naming’ it’s the single most likely thing to cause a field engineer to scream into the partially-lit datacenter in abject rage and hate. Even more if they remember how fucking sysVinit actually delivered on the promise. Even more if they still remember how well inittab Just Worked.
I agree with everything you've said, but this paragraph in particular resonated. We used to have a clean, simple, and predictable, system. Now we have exciting race conditions, a massively over complicated monolith ("but it's not", I hear the Lennart's fans scream, "you can just install the bits you want". To them I say "Try it. You'll soon wish for the sweet release of death. Install a good init system instead"), and once simple tasks being swamped by poorly designed tooling.
I'd say the entire design of it is badly thought out, but that implies there was much though given to it's design at all. It seems more like it simply coagulated. As another commenter said, it's become popular because it makes the disto builders' lives easier, not because it's better, and that leaves everyone actually using the thing in the lurch.
I won't say a bad word about Gentoo, I enjoyed running it, but if you want to use sysvinit, Debian works fine with it. There's a page on the wiki (linked form the install guide) on how to do it here. I've not run into any issues over the time I've been running like this, and having a clean init system makes my day a lot better.
Nagios. It does depend on what you mean by monitor though. Nagios is good at telling you that "service A on host B" is down" but less useful for looking at things like performance trends. I particularly like being able to setup dependencies between services, so I get the alert for the root cause, and not all of the services that have gone down because of it.
You dismiss the data you recorded because it doesn't seem to support your hypothysis tgat there is greater lag in wayland, but that's not really the right approach, and I think it points to a different conclusion.
You recorded a lag of 5 or 6 frames at 90 frames per second in both Xorg and wayland, which suggests that the lag is the same to within 0.011 seconds, and I don't think that you can say that's a huge difference. However, what you didn't test is the acceleration curve on mouse movement. If that curve is different under wayland it could easily feel infuriatingly laggy without actually showing any extra delay on the movement starting or ending.
I'm not sure how you'd accurately test that, a HID device just sending mouse move events wouldn't do it as wouldn't mimic you accelerating the mouse from stationary, so wouldn't exercise the acceleration curve in wayland. You might need a physical device that moves your actual mouse a fixed dustance and then measure the distance the cursor moves on screen. Repeat for different movement speeds and you might have sone useful data.
That's not the only way to do it. In quite a lot of situations you can, instead, generate artificial data that is statistically similar to the original data set and use that instead. That works well for things like system testing, performance tuning and integration testing. Done right, you can even still pull out useful corelations without risking deanonymising the data.
... and half the country is extremely enthusiastic about that.
There's the reason nothing is done about it. It's probably not actually half, but enough people didn't speak up early enough, and so this has become the loudest voice in the room. Unless, and until that changes, the whole world is in for a rough ride.
Well obviously. I mean, have you ever tried eating those things without sauce? They're bland, dry, and uninteresting. Clearly that crow has a more refined palette than that.
It probably also helps lubricate it to make it easier to swallow, crows really are smart.
Show up in person and explain exactly what you want to see from them, and why it would benefit them. Then let them talk to the next person, who does the same. Make sure your representatives hear the same message again, and again, until it's easier for them to do what you're asking than not.