pipsqueak1984 @ northmaple1984 @lemmy.ca

Posts

79

Comments

241

Joined

1 yr. ago

What's thr point of him reading it though? Unless he's allowed to give us actual specific details about it, nothing changes for us voters whether he reads it or not, just like nothing has changed for us voters just because Singh and May read it.

I'll tell you what will happen if he reads it: he'll spout off some vague bullshit just like May and Singh did and people will accuse him of lying for the purpose of stirring up political dissent for his own advantage.

You could not vote for the person if the parties don't have enough sense to dump them.

Lol, we are good at predicting some them, not all.

Perhaps we should put some significant effort into not being stuck on the this rock. If humanity surviving is the goal, there are several cosmic events that could wipe us out much faster than climate change if they occur.

She is a politician, that's enough reason to distrust her.

Yeah, sorry, but I don't trust May, Trudeau, Poilievre, Singh or Blanchet. There's no point in any of the party leaders seeing the list or report unless they are able to actually tell us the people who are involved.

Yes, because never in the course of any war throughout history have innocent bystanders been hit by accident.

Israel has enough firepower that if they were committing a genocide Gaza would have been a literal pile of rubble decades ago.

Sorry, I actually have respect for the word genocide and only use it when appropriate.

What's happening in Gaza isn't it.

Because it's literallt the government's media wing. Didn't trust it during the Chrétien, Martin or Harper years, don't trust it now, won't trust it when the CPC is back in.

I don't trust sources like Global or the Toronto Star either but at least they're an arm's length away from the government which makes them more credible than the CBC.

Some genocide, where the supposed aggressor takes care to try their best to move the target population out of harms way despite the fact that their actual militarised enemies deeply embed within the population, and the population grows enormously over the course of the decades of the supposed genocide.

If it is a genocide, someone needs to tell Israel they are doing it wrong.

Hahahahaha, because Hamas/Palestians and basically every Muslim country treats LGBTQ people so well....

I challenge these Pride organisations to go run a Pride Parade pretty kuch anywhere in the Middle East except Israel and see what happens.

And I really don't trust the CBC yet I still post thoss articles and don't complain about other people posting them.

What you're missing is that the minister that can make sharing the names legal via changing the required clearance is part of the government that refuses to do just that.

I'd be surprised if the NDP and Greens weren't involved either to be honest.

No, the list being released has been a huge point of contention.

Nah I'm pretty sure there was plenty of Islamists, neonazis and other groups from all sorts of countries targeting Jews long before Netanyahu was around and there will be long after he's gone. This is just the latest chapter in the several thousand year old world history of antisemitism.

Hang on, your solution is to raise the retirement age at a time when wages are actively being suppressed across multiple sectors because there are too many people competing for the same jobs?

Let's revisit that when applicants for near-minimum wage unskilled labour jobs aren't lining up around the block (virtually and sometimes physically) for a single opening.

Don't plan on making it past 40?

Is it pretty widely known that the trucking industry is taking advantage of foreign worker programs and setting low expectations (ex. shitty training, not punishing drivers for substandard practices) to increases profits.

Also, yes, he was picked ahead of others for a reason... perhaps a bad reason, or perhaps, given the current state of the economy, there was no real need for him to begin with. He's not a citizen so he has no right to stay, you've offered no compelling reasons of why he should be allowed.