Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)PI
Posts
79
Comments
241
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Probably because when you are having trouble feeding and housing yourself, a fraction of a percent of the population that isn't you doesn't matter. There are more people dying yearly because of failed Liberal+NDP policies than there are trans youth in total.

    The NDP should be seeing massive gains in a situation like this but unfortunately they made a deal with the devil that they seem hellbent on keeping, so what do you expect the majority of people to do? Vote Green and Bloc?

  • I meant in more of a way that we should hold those responsible for causing accidents before using tax money if it's reasonable to do so.

    Ex. If a drunk driver hurts someone, make the drunk driver personally liable for payments until they are bankrupt before using tax dollars to fill the gap. Or if someone gets hurt at work, back the company responsible until it is bankrupt, and make the injured party the #1 creditor during bankruptcy proceedings before using tax dollars.

  • If you had read my comment in it's entirety you'd have seen that I'm not opposed to paying for things such as random accidents. But something like Type 2 Diabetes isn't a random accident and is entirely preventable by the vast majority of people who have it.

  • The fact that I make a personal effort to not be a burden on this system yet I have to pay for people who purposely make themselves burdens.

    Quite honestly, I don't mind paying for certain accidents and injuries (those that are the result of criminal or civil liability should be paid for by the liable party not the taxpayer) and general aging, but when someone spends a few decades eating themselves into Type 2 diabetes I fail to see why the taxpayer should be on the hook for their medication or the results of them not having medication.

  • I eagerly await the details, because if it's only diabetes and birth control that's pretty disappointing, especially considering those are two issues that are largely (but not entirely) the product of an unhealthy life style.

    It'd be nice if the government encouraged healthy living more than it encouragedmedicating unhealthy living.

  • Yes, because all the neurons the Liberals and NDP have been devoting to policy have been working correctly. People love massively increased grocery and housing costs, and the massive increase in rate as well!