nonailsleft @ nonailsleft @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

1,247

Joined

2 yr. ago

Alas, those were different times

I'll keep repeating it: send Baldwin on and have Harris fake shoot him

The only difference between those assassinations might have been Pakistan, but even then it was a public secret that he was being protected by the ISI and so the US didn't risk informing their 'ally' of what they were about to do.

And in either of those cases, the US/Israel will have made a positive evaluation of the fallout. I've heard predictions that "Iran will instruct their proxy militias to strike at Israel". Yeah ok, what have they been doing for the last 10 months? And what caused Israel pressing the button this week? Or "They'll send a larger missile strike". Yeah ok they did that in April and unless they go full send Israel is probably going to be able to largely fend it off.

And with option nr2, some sane people might see that it's Iran that's choosing to escalate. I think it's unlikely that they want to, though. They are content just being in power and killing some sluts who dare show their hair in public, and mailing missiles to some schmucks to fight some religious wars elsewhere.

Israel just hit 2 foreigners as retaliation for Iranian-backed missile strikes on children. Earlier this year IS killed 80 Iranian civilians because they believed they were doing the worshipping thing a little bit wrong. Would they really start a war, which could end their reign, over this?

Lastly, why would Israel care who sits at the other end of the table? Haniya might have been somewhat rational, but that doesn't mean he wasn't praying for more jewish casualties five times a day. At any rate, it helps them when the other side is more openly genocidal. Israel has no real reason to stop this war before they've broken Hamas, so why would they ever want a deal that prevents this?

Didn't the US just go and straight up assassinate Bin Laden, Al Zawahiri, Al Baghdadi, ...?

Of course, there is only one available domain to do this, and that was hacked. There is no possible other way to get that data out but that one website. And it is, forever, hacked.

Send troops & kill the pan-Arabist militias

Worked for plenty of countries before though

That's a pretty naive take. There are plenty of rich religious fundamentalists, and plenty of poor atheists. And plenty of rich societies with very little tolerance for critical thinking

Access to education and societal tolerance to critical thinking?

Most are taught by their parents

It's in their religious texts

It's quite easy tho

It's bad when it's good, and it's good when it's bad

They believe they're better and should have more rights than other people

Sadly, there are too much religious nutjobs for this to work

Just you wait until those lines are fully solidified, good sir

Yeah tbh some instances come to mind

Don't count your chickens before you've...

Watched all of that guy that went to interview at the Trump rallies

But that's my exactly my point: you don't see the MP from this post asking for the athletes of any of those other countries to be banned. Doesn't that make him part of the problem? Does the fact that he only seems to care about one very particular conflict (as per the comment we're replying on: "because he's in a country with a large muslim population") not make his concern seem insincere?

Why would you only talk about Europe and forget about Russia, the Middle East and Northern Africa?

Well that's the point, innit? Do we see the same level of reaction for Darfur, Burkina Faso, Saudi-Arabia, ...