nonailsleft @ nonailsleft @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

1,247

Joined

2 yr. ago

Surely the almighty god they pray to five times a day wouldn't let something like that happen a second time, would he

What do you think about Hezbollah reopening the hostilities back in October? Do you believe they could have prevented all this bloodshed if they just kept the border in peace?

I understand you want to derail the discussion, but Hezbollah decided to attack Israel right after Hamas had their little excursion, before Israel launched their offensive in response

These are literally one-way receivers. It's like how I can't track your fm radio receiver

They injured thousands of their targets, killed a few, and only got very little collateral damage

Nasrallah would shit down his prophet's throat to get this kind of outcome

In this case it's Hezbollah that chose to 'expand the conflict' back in October

When Hezbollah chose to reopen hostilities with Israel the outcome would always be more death. Her father could have chosen peace instead

Both of them are 'wrong' and 'okay' when they do this. But in some way Hezbollah is 'more wrong', because they (re)started it. The only result being a lot of useless casualties with no end in sight.

They attacked one day after Hamas 'to keep the IDF busy'. Their long term goal is to destroy Israel and install an islamic state, not keep the peace.

Indeed. I'm paging Nasrallah right now that he should update his manifesto

Obviously Israel should kindly ask that they turn themselves over a the border so they can have a fair trial

But I see you’re German, so the psychosis doesn’t surprise me

In which world getting thousands of Hezbolla operatives unwittingly keeping a bomb in their pocket would not be a good use of resources for Israel?

we all knew a fair chunk of the voters

You guessed it: Not allowed

I'm not saying it's as annoying to read as some 'dance around the issue' 'articles' from 'the other side', but the need to inject a truckload of related bagage into every sentence just devalues the entire effort.

Like, yes Kevin, we know this is bad. We know it doesn't spark joy in the hearts of Haitian children. But just act like you're half a journalist and give us a clear cut of the cold dry facts. Wrap up your emotional shit in a closing paragraph if it helps you convince yourself

Ho ho ho seems we got our gold medalist right here

I can agree that it's debatable whether it was a good idea, but how is it 'nonsense' that the fact that sunset clause makes the deal very awkward? Why do you think the Iranians wanted it in, if not for the freedom to just develop nukes later?

Also the Iranian regime think they have a good shot at going to paradise because they allow men to rape their child brides, amongst other horrific shit. I can see the case we don't want these kind of people with the power of nuclear weapons.

They just shifted their resources to the missile development side of the puzzle, and the deal itself would only limit their uranium enrichment for 15 years. It just kicked the can down the road to 2031 for Iran to have their nukes 'legally'.

He'll write them some firm words on the bombs

Tbh the idea under Obama to bait the Iranians to drop their religious nuclear nutjobbery with money was naive at best. Even under the agreement, they were doing everything they could to advance towards nukes.