nitrolife @ nitrolife @rekabu.ru

Posts

13

Comments

165

Joined

2 yr. ago

Moderating

---

So it's not an "open" place like telegram and with that not as attractive for advertising illicit services or products.

As telegram. If you think that some drug dealers create public chats with sell drugs, so... you are wrong. All work with darknet. In telegram all of them use only private one-by-one crypto chats.

besides that, Signal is the technically much more secure variant. No discussion about it.

If you want protect yourself for random network administrator on your network line, of course. If you want protect from anyone (government for example), of course not. Not necessarily in a bad way. Privatecrypto chats one-by-one are equally protected for the Russian opposition and for drug dealers. This is freedom of information. And that's why Durov was arrested. and not because he can hack chats something but don't do that. I think in really because that he can't hack chats and don't approve hack / insert backdoors for anyone.

an interesting assumption. how can private encrypted chats be hacked? On custom self compiled clients if you think that client have hole. I learned telegram protocol and don't find any case. XD

Maybe the difference is that the signal developers aren't rich people flying around the EU on private jets?

Telegram is not first durov project. Durov create VK. That is number one Russian facebook.

Maybe there's no value in targeting the signal device because they can't legally be expected to moderate cats they literally can not access?

Can them connect any number of users in chat? That mean that them have access in any chat. And them should follow all USA laws of course.

Maybe it's not worth backdooring because it's open source?

Telegram open source too. And have many open client apps. For example clients without AD API support. How much custom client apps have signal?

That's not true. Signal stores all messages on device.

Ok. Signal win one point.

Encryption on Telegram only works in 1 on 1 chats and is turned off by default meaning no one use it.

so, I use the telegram crypto chat to get a credit card pin from my bank. do you want to do this with signal? =)

in 1 on 1

and in turn, this means that the FSB log collector is not connected in the third place. =)

P.S. Do you understand the absurdity of the situation? telegram is not safe enough, but for some reason it is preferred by drug dealers. The lives of these people literally depend on the messenger. and the European Union was so unable to cope with this that it arrested the developer for complicity.

and this does not prevent you from connecting the FBI log collector in the background. He will always be active.

I live in a country where, when crossing the border, they can request a phone for check chats, so I can roughly imagine how it works. Government has a much higher level of access. if the account is restored via SMS, this means that any FSB employee can connect your account to himself. if the conversation is not one-on-one, it means that the FSB log collector is somewhere in third place. This is the reality. I don't understand why you think that your government collect data somehow another. may be from really bad people's, but with same methods.

P.S. on telegram you have only one-by-one crypto chats. Protocol can't connect anyone else.

On the other hand, Durov was arrested in Europe, but the developers of the signal somehow does not.

Well, for some unknown reason, drug dealers still choose telegram. And they don't just have an unfounded choice, but the profit depends on the messenger. Or say you that Durov was arrested for no reason?

P.S. in Russia now testing system for ban all messengers don't hosted in Russia. They next after youtube. Telegram too. Information from first hands. =)

Why not? Unlike whatsapp and signal, telegram private chats are not synchronized. So if you lost your phone and started a new one, the chats will not magically recover as in whatsapp. Because recover is unsecure. So the telegram is quite private.

or do you mean that encryption is not enabled by default in every chat? This is not an indicator of the messenger's privacy.

Although Tox takes them all by the head, of course.

I see this channel time by time. Mini apartments in tokio. it looks like an advertising channel, but it's actually interesting.

Russian, English and some Japanese.

Insert logs in pastebin.com and attach links and you can open ticket on git.

You can use postfix + dovecot + roundcube + spamassassin + opendkim + pigeonhole. Maximum stability. Roundcube have aliases plugin.

You can start from here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Virtual_user_mail_system_with_Postfix,_Dovecot_and_Roundcube

Topic starter don't use docker containers. He use lxc containers. LXC is virtual machines on host kernel. Case is that: He have 3 virtual machines with shared disk. In 3 VMs have 3 different applications. Applications work under different users and can't rewrite data on shared disk. That is user permissions problem.

the idea is that: all your applications work under the same user. or at least under the same group. because this is exactly how the differentiation of rights is applied.

A good plan is to create some kind of user in all three containers and run qbittorrent, samba and the third application under it.

A bad plan is to run everything under a random user with 777 rights, but this is a really bad plan.

Create a user in all three containers and work under it. That is not hard. Run qbittorent with that user. Config will be there: /home/user/.config . Then set that user for samba. I don't know third app , but I think you can find how change user in manual.

You can use Revolt. Literaly Discord clone. https://github.com/revoltchat

Her argument for being vocal is that her and her generation will have to live with the consequences of our fuckups the longest and hardest.

Surprise, but if you stop generate energy by oil you can't have hard industry. It is quite difficult to cast steel without huge energy consumption. And aluminum is even more difficult. But for some reason, no one wants to ride horses and abandon airplanes. Them can stop buy industrial products. And problem will gone.

And no, strangling heavy industry in your country until it is evacuated to China is not a fight for the global environment.

It is convenient, of course, to tell what idiots everyone around is without having worked a single day in heavy industry. And in Greta's case, without having worked a day at all, apparently. I suggest she work at the factory for a couple of years and then repeat her statements.

And it is better to live for a couple of years in a country with a less mild climate. Let's say where it is -30 in winter. Surely she doesn't hope that all 9 billion people will fit into the warm bosom of the Gulf Stream? Pollution from heating is also very significant. We don't even turn off cars here in some cities because then we just won't start them.

or you can't buy if you're not successful enough or you're in the wrong country. For example, in my country, the minimum cost of a 1TB SSD is about $85 and a salary of $2,000 is considered a very successful salary at the upper limit

You really won't see this in the USA, because few people even reach the border. After September 11, the United States is fine with eliminating threats. For example, the United States knew about this attack for 2 weeks.

UPD: I also remind you that after September 11, the United States did not limit itself to one person but beat up an entire country

At the beginning of the article, it is mentioned that only the use of uranium-238, which is now not used, will expand the reserves of nuclear fuel by about 200 times.

UPD: also in another article I read that not all uranium is completely destroyed in the reactor cycle, the rest turns into radioactive waste, which in a few years can be cooled and recycled into new rods for the reactor. in France, for example, they have been doing this for a long time. Here: https://habr.com/ru/articles/588877/

Oh, if only the reactors worked exclusively on uranium. Of course, I can quote Rosatom's articles, but unfortunately they are only in Russian. A closed fuel cycle was developed there back in 2015. If you want you can use Google translate: https://habr.com/ru/articles/388533/

P.S. It is very specific to get scientific knowledge from a book called GREEN POLITICAL THOUGHT

Some countries successfully dismantle the remnants of the rods. Residues are extracted from spent nuclear fuel and rods are made not on uranium but on plutonium. The remmans of this rods is even more enriched than before reaktor starting work. as a result, it is possible to burn unenriched uranium and other heavy nuclei, so that the fuel will definitely last for a long time.