Yeah, I was just confused about the direction/flow he was asking for. He clarified and his use case is fully solvable. Just not something I've personally dabbled in since he wants it for non http traffic.
Well thats just a normal reverse proxy then. In my setup I use Caddy to send traffic through the NetBird managed wireguard tunnel to my home machine that runs Jellyfin but for any outside observer it look like it's my VPS that is serving Jellyfin.
If you can fool the Internet that traffic coming from the VPS has the source IP of your home machine what stops you from assuming another IP to bypass an IP whitelist?
Also if you expect return communication, that would go to your VPS which has faked the IP of your home machine. That technique would be very powerful to create man in the middle attacks, i.e. intercepting traffic intended for someone else and manipulating it without leaving a trace.
IP, by virtue of how the protocol works, needs to be a unique identifier for a machine. There are techniques, like CGNAT, that allows multiple machines to share an IP, but really it works (in simplified terms) like a proxy and thus breaks the direct connection and limits you to specific ports. It's also added on top of the IP protocol and requires specific things and either way it's the endpoint, in your case the VPS, which will be the presenting IP.
The thing is that if you could (without circumventing the standards) do so then that implies that IP isn't actually a unique identifier, which is needs to be. It would also mean circumventing whitelists / blacklists would be trivial (it's not hard by any means but has some specific requirements).
The correct way to do this, even if there might be some hack you could do to get the actual source IP through, is to put the source in a 'X-Forwarded-For' header.
As for ready solutions I use NetBird which has open source clients for Windows, Linux and Android that I use without issues and it's perfectly self-hostable and easy to integrate with your own IDP.
Yeah, texture fidelity is one metric but for textures really how good or bad they are depend much more on the skill and attention to detail behind making it more so than raw numbers. The models themselves is really the only part where the increased polycount actually shines through and makes it competitive because it is so important to make things like hands, hair and clothing look "right'. But the aesthetics of SS is just so bland and flat that it ends up looking like an old tech demo.
The thing I just don't get is what purpose would bombing even serve in this war? We all know Hamas hides in the tunnels, we all know IDF doesn't know everything about said tunnels (i.e. doesn't have a perfect map of them) and blowing up tunnels by bombing the houses on top just feels like the most destructive way possible.
I get it's far more dangerous to clear the tunnels inch by inch on foot. They're likely booby trapped and it is fighting your enemy on home turf. But given that civilians aren't allowed in the tunnels it seems like the obvious way to minimize civilian casualties down to virtually nothing. Pair that with above ground house by house clearing and you have the slowest war in world history yes, but maybe the first ethical war as well. But it's clear that was never a goal. Israel is doing what they can to ensure they get to finish this before the world at large stops them. And by finish I mean raze Gaza (and the West Bank) to the ground and end any hope for Palestinan statehood once and for all.
I think Swift's main demographic is actually in the bracket 16-25 so plenty of voters there. The younger teens are, generally, into more fresh/new acts and stuff with more of an edge. Swift has been around for a long time now.
Sure, but I take great offense at the hyperbole in the headline and core of the article. I hate when media takes pity on the rich kid with problems and act like they're the world's biggest. When the poor kid has it worse but no one gives a shit.
Being cynical and very utilitarian that doesn't have to be a bad thing for the economy. They had a "surplus" in terms of high unemployment for uneducated men which this war has "fixed" and that means lessening the burden on government finances.
Which country do you think is the most depressing? As its defined in the article, i.e. the nation causing the most depression? My bet is every single nation above Korea is vastly more depressing and people only care about and think Korea is exceptional because it is much closer to our western Nations.
Brothers in Arms is fantastic and squad management is not a very intrusive part of it at all.
As for the saturation it wasn't just FPS, it was that every genre (well, baring racing I guess, but there every game was heavily "Fast & Furious" inspired) had more than one WWII game, it was ridiculous...
And even then Korea doesn't even break the top 10 in suicide per capita. Having more diagnosed depression is hardly a worthwhile stat when that depends more on the availability of doctors and psychologist to make the diagnosis.
"The most depressing country I can book a direct flight to and book all hotels and travel arrangements online, and make do with only English for the duration"
Well if I understand process correctly the first $5 million that he was forced to put in escrow for the appeal he just lost should be hers within the month. The large sum however will likely take years at the minimum.
Yeah, the way the public consensus now says the US should act as world police is one hell of a flip. I say stay out of it and that means washing your hands of it and stop selling offensive weapons to a nation in an offensive war. Ukraine is different because they're the ones being attacked.
Biden is fucking up this situation for sure. But he's still infinitely better for the US and the world than Trump.
No the scenario a VM protects from is the T110s motherboard/cpu/PSU/etc craps out and instead of having to restore from off-site I can move the drives into another enclosure and then map them the same way to the VM and start it up. Instead of having to wait for new hardware I can have the fileserver up and running again in 30 minutes and it's just as easy to move it into the new server once I've sourced one.
And in this scenario we're only running the fileserver on the T110, but we still virtualized it with proxmox because then we can easily move it to new hardware without having to rebuild/migrate anything. As long as we don't fuck up the drive order or anything like that, then we're royally fucked.
Yeah, I was just confused about the direction/flow he was asking for. He clarified and his use case is fully solvable. Just not something I've personally dabbled in since he wants it for non http traffic.