nimpnin @ nimpnin @sopuli.xyz

Posts

3

Comments

255

Joined

1 yr. ago

swear edging

housing is artificially scarce

Housing is not artificially scarce, because land is naturally scarce.

Renting will always cost more than the upkeep of a house because otherwise nobody would lease

On average yes, but you also do not need to account for variability in price due to for example, having to replace the plumbing every 20 years or so.

All your issues with personal ownership of a house stem from other people treating housing as private property that can be invested in

This addresses none of the things I listed.

I think housing is a human right but homeownership has nothing to do with it. Governmental intervention or renters organizing or both is required to secure the right.

Given a rental apartment with an affordable rent where I could live as long as I want, why would I want to own property instead?

I don’t want to worry about the plumbing being replaced or the floor having water damage, and that putting tens of thousands of costs on me randomly. I don’t want to speculate what the price of the apartment is in ten years and how that affects my mortgage. I don’t want to not have housing anymore if I get a pest infestation.

I think it’s the other way round, people own property because it is seen (and often is) the only way to have reasonable housing costs and not worry about having to move if you don’t want to.

A single home owner does not expect to profit from that investment

What are you talking about? People definitely buy homes as an investment so that they can sell it and retire.

increase in value provides the means to move to a new home

What is this, if not profiting off an investment?

Housing being a human right has nothing to do with getting rid of rental properties. If anything, having to buy a house is a lot bigger barrier to housing than rent.

What we need is rent to be affordable, and landlords to do their job, i.e. maintain and fix the apartments. There are many ways to achieve this: government owned housing, legal regulation, tenant unions etc. Everybody buing a house or an apartment is not one of them.

Homeowners also treat their home as an investment. Which also makes housing more expensive and inaccessible. Moving away from renting is not the solution, we need a more comprehensive change in the system.

Remember that we live in the age of open/free content. So much is available under creative commons, or otherwise freely available compared to the pre internet era.

worst take of the week

Waking up the same time every day. Or at trying my best to

Darcs does not require a central server, and works perfectly in offline mode.

Git can be used that way too. Am I missing something?

Sivuhuomio: D'Hondtin menetelmä ei juurikaan suosi suurempia puolueita 200 edustajan eduskunnassa. Sen sijaan jako vaalipiireihin luo piilevän äänikynnyksen, joka voi olla aika korkeakin (Lapissa jopa 9,7 prosenttia).

BlueSky is mastodon where the main instance has ads and a marketing team. Otherwise really similar.

Just pick any, it doesn't matter

Or use matrix on the computer

IDK man, the people with no or few friends tend to be weird but not really bad in any meaningful way: socially awkward, shy, odd interests, neurodivergent etc. Difficult to get to know, plain and simple. People with a lot of friends are often worse people, manipulative and/or have a transactional attitude to relationships

Tired: obsessing over the roman empire

Wired: obsessing over other ancient civilizations

Bring a printed copy of your ESTA / visa for immigration. Get some kind of travel insurance that covers health emergencies, and have proof of that printed as well.

There were no good options. And that’s because of the electoral system.

In my home country of Finland, you can be elected from prison.