nieminen @ nieminen @lemmy.world

Posts

5

Comments

359

Joined

2 yr. ago

I totally get it, and I don't have xitter or anything like that so don't see the majority of the trash she's reported to say and do, I just wanted to see what her "official" position was as a starting point to compare to what she's actually doing and saying elsewhere.

I don't think this is the right take.

I think perhaps people on the Internet get jaded towards questions and discourse because it's often disingenuous or just trolling. Do they jump to a conclusion? Perhaps, but it also feels like you may have here.

My comment above is currently (and I expect forever) sitting in the negative, I think this is probably for the reason you stated. I'm going to leave it as is because it's an honest starting point for me, and hopefully it'll also help someone else come in, see a resonance with how they think, and also learn something. One commenter already provided videos for me to study and learn from, which I will do as soon as I can.

I'm hoping overall people understand that I'm coming from a place of honest curiosity and openness. I see all the bigotry around and it disgusts me. I just want to make sure I understand this topic as much as I can as a cis-male.

Yeah that one argument never felt particularly strong to me anyway, like men transitioning to win at sports or whatever.

Thank you for this. I will absolutely go through both videos.

I appreciate the context you provided as well. In my mind it makes sense that someone willing to break the law to hurt people isn't going to stop because the sign on the door says it's not for them. That argument never felt particularly strong to me, and I'm glad that you've affirmed it basically doesn't happen.

I'm no troll, and am truly trying to understand further.

Thanks again for your time, I hope to be able to watch those videos soon.

Okay, I'm sure I'll get vote-bombed here, please don't jump the gun, I'm pro lgbtq+. I don't give a shit who or how someone loves, just hope they're allowed to be happy with themselves (unless they're hurting people, obviously).

I believe trans rights, and womens rights, are human rights. I don't think anybody should be treated differently due to gender, sex, race, or orientation, and they shouldn't be discriminated against in any way. I'm just trying to make sure I understand fully for when I defend the pro trans position that I believe to be correct.

I started looking further into this because a friend of mine, which is a total HP nerd, was trying to give me some context on where her anti-trans activism comes from. It SEEMS like she mostly wants to make sure women stay safe (paraphrasing her own words here). In Scotland apparently they're changing things so that a dude can just say he's not a dude, and be legally allowed in all women only spaces if they register with the government or whatever. I can absolutely see how that could be used in a predatory manor, and can see that side of the argument.

I just read her piece here: https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/ To make sure I'm getting as complete of a look at the situation as I can.

And it confused the issue a little for me. All of her arguments seem to be coming from a place of reason, and some of them made sense (if the referenced stats were true). Most of her arguments seem to come from a "I don't want to make it easier for male predators to prey on women" standpoint, which makes sense at the surface level.

is the current climate making it fashionable to transition? I find it hard to believe someone would go that far without truly thinking it's the right thing to do, but some people are highly influenced by peer pressure. I can also see maybe some women wanting to change to escape the misogyny of our current world. I'm a straight cis-male, and I can't personally resonate with the idea of changing that because it's "popular" or whatever, so I don't put a lot of credence into that argument, but I'm not everyone 🤷.

I also understand that sex and gender are separate, and Rowling seems to be on the train that conflates it, which might be the basis for her position.

Please help me learn and understand. Someone with more context or knowledge, please let me know. I'd love the opinion of some trans folks if you see this. Rowling says she's getting support from trans women for her positions. And I'm sure that's true, there's bound to be some, like there's women who support patriarchy.

Edit, reordered my statements so my current position is clear at the start

I'm glad this post exists, I thought it was just me.

Must... Add... New triangles.....

Isn't that.... Indian?

I don't blame Jews for what's happening, I blame Israel. Yes, there are many Jews that support what's happening, but that's no different from any other body of people.

Claiming what Israel is doing right now reflects on all Jews is the same as blaming trump on all Americans.

I'm referring to the fact that "anti" and "semitism" are existing complete words. Every other example of a word given the "anti" prefix that i can think of is very clearly meaning, the opposite or against the existing definition of the word.

Antidisestablishmentarianism Antisocial Anticlimactic Antiacidemic Antibacterial Antifreeze Antihero Antihistamine

Hammer in your comment is a poor example, because hammer is its own word, despite the first three letters happening to be an existing other word. Antisemitism is clearly anti and semitism.

What's annoying, is since this term was coined (as you said, in germany), it was purely a dog whistle for jew hatred.

Wikipedia:

The compound word antisemitismus was first used in print in Germany in 1879[19] as a "scientific-sounding term" for Judenhass (lit. 'Jew-hatred'),[20] and it has since been used to refer to anti-Jewish sentiment alone.[21][22][23] Due to the root word Semite, the term is sometimes subject to an etymological fallacy whereby it is incorrectly assumed to apply to racist hatred directed at "Semitic people", in spite of this being an obsolete racial concept.[23]

We need to let language do its thing, and adjust the meaning of this word to mean what it appears to mean, not some wink wink nudge nudge version you have to know ahead of time.

If you're android, there's an app called smoldering durtles, otherwise you gotta use the website. I created a tasker profile to notify me when new lessons or reviews are available. Lmk if you're interested

Check out wanikani. It's SRS, but done really well.

https://www.wanikani.com/

KKKaroline in one of her recent briefings said that basically he's doing this in his personal time, and is unrelated to his presidency. They can probably use that 🤷 not that they will though

I'm atheist, but honestly the accuracy that trump meets every description of the antichrist, it's insane.

Looking into this, it turns out all the dictionaries indeed seem to say it's jew specific, which I think is a failing of the English language, because Jews are a drop in the bucket for semitic populations.

I'll concede your point, despite the word structure literally implying something bigger.

Wikipedia

Webster

Oxford

Edit added references

Technically the genocide is antisemitic, because Palestinians are semitic.

Good luck finding anything. They're probably in a jar in Putin's closet

This sounds like Zionism...