Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NI
Posts
2
Comments
295
Joined
1 yr. ago

Permanently Deleted

Jump
  • Well, I never argued for not sanctioning them. I just think it's kind of fucked either way - if sanctions work, they start hating sanction imposers and band behind the dictator; if sanctions don't work, then obviously they are going to praise the dictator for his good work. It's lose-lose.

    And I don't know if you have noticed or not, unfortunately, the sanctions aren't working that well... Maybe the answer is more sanctions? idk

  • Where should they move to? Countries that aren't sanctioning Russia right now are likely to be... problematic? in other ways. But I am also pretty ignorant about which countries are on that list, and I would like to know more.

    Maybe they need to become pirates on international water...

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Sure... Their anger will be directed at Putin, not at who actually imposed those sanctions.

    I am worried that these sanctions will make them band together and support Putin even more.

  • this argument isn't going to work on someone who believes god created said lead... and also, pretty sure not all lead was created from nuclear decay.

    i get dunk on people feels satisfying, but this is just bad science communication through and through

  • If he did that that would have been genuine discrimination. If he has to do it now because of sanctions, then ok fine. But otherwise I don't want to see an open source project treating people differently based on where they were born.

    Come on lemmy, how is this pro-racism comment upvoted so many times? Please, think.

  • IANAL, but I think the general answer is no. When someone contribute code to an open source project, although they aren't giving up their copyright, they do grant the recipient (and the rest of the world, for that matter) a license to use their code. In case of Linux, this is the GNU Public License. Unless GPL has a section about license revocation that I am not aware of, you won't be able to take your code back.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Unpopular opinion but I don't see what is wrong with this? With the current policy, if your account is public people who you block will still be able to see your tweets by simply logout (e.g. by opening twitter in a private window, using a different browser where they are not logged in, etc. doesn't take any effort).

    I think this is setting the wrong expectations.

  • that heavily depends on how you define "intelligence". if you insist on "think, reason and behave like a human", then no, we don't have "Artificial Intelligence" yet (although there are plenty of people that would argue that we do). on the other hand if you consider the ability to play chess or go intelligence, the answer is different.