neukenindekeuken @ neukenindekeuken @sh.itjust.works

Posts

0

Comments

297

Joined

3 mo. ago

We are watching colonization happening right now, in modern times. Disgusting.

BEES?

Anyway...

And the right angles are supposed to be inside, not 2 out 2 in

Nope, very serious, it's a good plan and you should do it. We need people to do what people like Fetterman and that one from NM did to the democratic party.

This is a great plan, patriotic even, and you should do it.

Only the best people. For him to recruit to his Gestapo.

And also a huge issue for anyone using a VPN to browse the web

Yeah, that's a decent middleground. It still doesn't solve the more extreme/inclement weather issue if the cardboard gets wet, say when thrown into an ice chest, or accidentally dropped off a fishing boat; but it's good enough for most applications.

I always wonder why he couldn't just drink Coke. It's more sugar water than sugar and water.

And more resilient to weather/time/etc. for transporting in sub-optimal conditions.

There's also the possibility that since this is edible and exposed, putting this in a warehouse would invite a horde of rodents and insects.

It's a good idea, but the reason we haven't done this before is because it creates inconvenient problems for distribution centers and the logistics of transportation and storage. Which in the short and long run, costs more money to either prevent the negative outcomes, or deal with them later.

It is better for the environment, but I'd rather go after billionaires and huge corporations polluting the environment without repercussions first.

It is not a potato.

Potatoes are a member of the Nightshade family.

Sweet "Potatoes" are from the Morning Glory family.

Completely separate genus. Even though they can be mostly cooked and prepared similarly, they are not related.

4, 6 (if super crispy), 1, 3, 2, 7, 5, 8

You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you. That's how this works.

You can't say there's science to back up your claims, then not use science (burden of proof) to back up your claims.

If I claimed there was a pink polka dot elephant in the trunk of my car, that can teleport to other dimensions with its trunk; I would be required to post proof of that. If I told people to Google it, because there's science out there that backs up my assertion, they'd tell me to get bent.

Don't be lazy and fall into that pit trap. Post a proof, any proof, to back up your assertions, or every single person in this thread is free to ignore you and assume you're making this up.

Edit: Looks like someone did your job for you, and is suggesting that your claims are incorrect and takes the wrong conclusions from the study.

This is why it's important for you to cite your sources when you make a claim. Typically people refusing to cite their sources or saying "just google it" are often wrong about the conclusions they draw from whatever research was done. This is why peer review is important, even though none of us are in that field, it's important to be able to have your claims withstand peers criticizing it. If it can't stand up to that, then it's likely incorrect and we can put that in the "failed hypothesis" bin.

Which is where your hypothesis would go.

And that's science. Kinda.

That's wild and awesome, TIL, thanks!

Feel free to post that research at some point.

Ah, got it, thank you!

Is that a reliant robin? Badass.

Wasp nest was definitely worth it, agreed.

I don't get it, do you mind explaining?

Also see: Champagne