nac82 @ nac82 @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

315

Joined

2 yr. ago

Is there a lemmy wallstreetbets, and if so, how is this not a post in it?

I would wish you luck in investing, but honestly, I would rather watch reddit quietly burn than them start developing some new horrors of monetization.

I like how you had to make up shit I didn't say to get mad about and justify yall making asses of yourselves in defense of exploitative capitalism.

You don't like that your shameful behavior has been called out and need an excuse to cope.

What an ironic point to make with 0 context.

Nintendo is the original gacha / lootbox developer. You must not remember their original big money maker was selling randomized packs of collectible cards to children, a practice they are still perfecting to this day.

Nintendo has 10x the market share of any other gacha game too, so even if others are more exploitative, they aren't causing as much overall damage due to market share.

Sure you would.

Yes, I am acknowledging that in my comment. I'm saying I don't understand how people stomach this garbage, and I stated the specifics of what I found so repulsive in the co sumption of their products.

Where is the insult here? I called yall out after yall trash talked first. Yall start shit but don't like it when it is addressed.

Play better games is my recommendation. Have a better frame of reference lmao. That will help you understand why a 30-hour Nintendo title charging $70 doesn't even compete with modern $15 indie titles.

Yes, a comment on a board is shouting outrage.

Shout your outrage elsewhere. Yall are desperate for a personal insult to avoid confronting the conversation about Nintendo.

Lies. They have taken down multiple classic emulation websites over the years. Yuzu was only the most recent victim of their bs.

They take down private mods made by individuals all the time, too. It's straight-up coping to deny the vile shit Nintendo does in the name of profit.

Sure, that's why you felt the need to not discuss the topic.

Feel free to respond to the content of my comment at some point.

Yall are crying victim to deflect from the conversation about supporting a garbage company that weilds capitalism as a weapon.

Yes, I am acknowledging that in my comment. I'm saying I don't understand how people stomach this garbage, and I stated the specifics of what I found so repulsive in the co sumption of their products.

Which I support. I dont support people who are financing this corporate behemoth that destroys video game history and fans for money.

You need something to whatabout because you can't address the points directly. Childish response that fits the childish fanbase of Nintendo perfectly.

The only game developers that are anywhere in the same running as Nintendo on Anticonsumer practices would be EA, Ubisoft, and Warner Brothers. Maybe arguably Playstation and Xbox.

Literally any other game developer could be listed as a favorite game series and avoid most of the criticisms I've laid out.

As somebody who isn't buying their products, I can say they are overcharging. Your point falls apart when your base assumption is removed.

Idk how people still stomach Nintendo. They get 1 decent exclusive every other year, while the rest of the time, they are overcharging for all their garbage products. Most anticonsumer, anticompetition developer on the market that releases products that lag behind the rest of the industry by 5-10 years.

They crush emulation and antique game preservation sites as a hobby.

How is yet another Mario game worth coming back to?

People love saying this so they can call something dumb without opening their views to criticism.

Lazy idiotic complaint.

Turns out the moderators of this forum are in this group. Read the other comment chains here.

True, I've assumed too much. It just falls right in that Fox news narrative from 2 years back they were doing a lot.

Said the dude who posts video links and leaves uncivil slapfight responses when you are getting called out for spreading misinformation.

Moderate your own comments before moderating others.

If moderation is being used as a tool to manipulate conversation on the thread, I don't see how people can be expected not to talk about it.

What instance is that group on? I might have it blocked.