I have empathy for people who are put in awful situations, not people who taking risky actions. Some people just can't be helped. For example:
The Ottawa resident planned to be in England for five days in mid-March to make arrangements for her ailing mother, bringing along eight days worth of drugs to manage her diabetes and auto-immune disease.
I've seen advice that you should take up to 30-60 extra days of medication when traveling abroad, just in case.
She's in the country of her sole-citizenship. This is part of the process when you put off finalizing paperwork for 2+ decades. Both the UK and Canada allow for dual citizenship.
I downvoted it because someone living in Canada for 25 years and not getting their citizenship, it's their fault. They should understand the risks of leaving Canada if they don't have full citizenship.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre insisted Wednesday that his promised three-strikes law wouldn’t run afoul of the Constitution, after several justice experts said some of his crime policies are likely to get struck down by the courts.
Sure, I'll trust the guy with a BA in international relations over literal experts in the law!
LiberuxNexx sounds like a medication's marketing name.
It says "2TB storage" then in the details it's actually 256GB + microSD support, which IMHO is very different.
To me, this just sounds like a new version of the PinePhone Pro or Librem 5. Yes, it's got newer & better hardware, but there's no release date or even price.
When they say "recession," they are talking about a very specific definition:
Declines in real gross national income (GNI) for two consecutive quarters
This can only be confirmed once we have the data. So, you are likely right, we are probably already in a recession. However, it's not "They just don’t want to acknowledge it’s happening," it's that they can't confirm it's happening until 6 months after a recession has started.
We do not have "northern provinces", those are territories.
For a less pedantic answer:
the territories are administered differently, with much more control from the Federal government
they have <120K in population which make statistical data difficult
they have very unique sociocultural circumstances (remoteness, high percentage of Inuit people, many "fly in" industries, etc) that make them hard to compare to the rest of Canada.
Your comment is very short, so I may be reading too much into it. However, most people who deny Residential Schools were part of genocide, simply don't know the definition. From the UN:
genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Many people assume genocide can is only something like the Holocaust, where there's an attempt to exterminate a group, but it can be more subtle, such as, "killing the indian in the child."
Sure, that's completely true but unrelated to what you said in your original comment. I quote:
Why would anyone with that much money want to come here permanently
You were not talking about non-resident citizens, so stop moving the goalposts.
Plus, the US has one of the lowest tax rates of any of those "large countries" you talked about. So unless a US citizen resided in a country without a tax treaty with the US (there's not many of them), they're almost certainly being charged enough tax in their resident country that they pay $0 to the IRS on non-USA income.
In answer to your questions, some polls break down their results by region and very rarely (but sometimes) there is riding specific data. Poll Aggregators have to careful about these as they sometimes involve small sample sizes. For example, I think Philippe was talking about one in the last couple years that broke down their results by province, but PEI only had 42 responses (that's like 3884 Ontarians per capita, which is a good sample size) which is too small a sample to consider so he just aggregated the Atlantic provinces. Riding specific polls are also rarely useful due to small sample size, infrequent polling, and questions about their methodology.
The secret sauce of these poll aggregators is how they rate polling firms/methods and how they weigh ridings for past performance, shifting demographics, and current candidates. If you're curious for more, I like listening to Philippe and Éric Grenier talk about polling on The Numbers podcast.
I just want to add the other thing about 538 & 338 Canada is that they take vote efficiency into account. A lot of people look at polls, see a percentage and take that as the person/party's chance of winning. However, given in both our systems that it's not a straight popularity contest, those percentages need to be given context. In the US, the Democrats vote is inefficient, because they get huge margins in states like New York and California. It doesn't matter whether the winner of that state gets one more vote than their opponent, or 3,194,482 (the difference in California), most states are winner-take-all. Similarly, Canadian electoral districts are winner-take-all, and the Conservative party runs up their vote in the prairies (often winning 60%+ in a riding). This means their vote is inefficient so even even if the polls are right and they get close to the same number of votes as the Liberals, they won't get anywhere near as many seats.
I'm curious to see what the "Custom processor made by NVIDIA" is, partially to see what the Switch 2 is capable of, but also to see what Nvidia might put in other devices. (Can I hope for a Shield refresh?)
I did. Twice, so I could make that comment. What makes you think I didn't read the article?