n2burns @ n2burns @lemmy.ca

Posts

0

Comments

1,009

Joined

2 yr. ago

I don't think any of them did riding-specific polls/predictions.

I think most aggregators had PP winning as the most likely outcome, but his defeat was within the MOE.

FTA:

...hotpatching has been available for the longest time for Windows Server Datacenter: Azure Edition, and it will continue without charge...

I think they'll have the next election (the 2026 mid-term) but I'm less sure about the election after that...

It appears you didn't link the article.

Does lemmy have a sub for badlegaladvice? This comment feels like a prime candidate :)

That doesn't say anything about this case. Given it wasn't just ICE involved, it's possible that a judicial warrant was obtained.

Source? I copied that from the article.

I'm just responding the the meme asking Police to come back with a warrant

The agents had a search warrant for the home

Might be too nitpicky but the article says

Liberal Leader Mark Carney was re-elected in his Ottawa riding

which seems like such a huge error.

FTA

It was unclear if he had managed to find the device.

I think that was Carleton because they have 91 candidates on the ballot, so they had to get a special dispensation to start early.

EDIT fixed autocorrect

CBC said it's riding by riding the order they count the ballots.

Could change, but as of right now, they're not leading anywhere.

Although it’s not available for the most serious violent offences — such as murder, sexual assault or aggravated assault — it can be used for lesser crimes.

While this program isn't set up for serious offences, restorative justice can be brought to these situations too. It's usually less of an "alternative justice" and more of a parallel to our punitive justice system to but can bring healing to both victims and perpetrators.

TBF, with the vast majority of Canadians living close to the border, many Canadian's cross the land border and then fly domestically within the US.

As a white, cis, hetero, Christian male, I don't know even know if I'd be willing to go to the states! Maybe if it was for work, but even then I'd probably push back.

I see a possible scenario where I cross the border for a day trip (go to a show, a game, or even just dinner), and can't leave. I know it's not very likely, especially given my privileged, but if that situation came to pass, that would be hugely disruptive. Before 2025, I'd say that scenario is almost impossible, as Canadians could even get home after 9-11.

Authoritarians? You mean glorious communists! /s

That's not how legislation is typically written. Anyways, just because someone states their purpose doesn't mean that's actually their intentions. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

I'm more than happy to support any measures which actually increase safety, but prohibiting these guns is just for show. Putting forward ineffective legislation like this wastes political capital which could have instead been used to actually make our society safer.

It's not a strawman. I am all for gun safety, but the rifles that have been recently "prohibited" are simply models that "look scary" while their sporterized counterparts have had their classification unchanged.