response to recent trends rule
myliltoehurts @ myliltoehurts @lemm.ee Posts 2Comments 152Joined 2 yr. ago
Yes, an airport limits the amount of people, has a very high coverage of surveillance and a high ratio of security staff as well as an entry barrier and dedicated VIP areas. A generic place outside has none of that. Although feel free to elaborate on how an airport is worse for security than just being on a street, anywhere.
To your second point, sure she doesn't need to own them like nobody else does, but the issue (for me) is not primarily that she (or anyone) owns one, but that they [private jets and private airports] exist, and they're subsidized by us as it was pointed out above. If anything, they should be priced outrageously so using them would come down last resort or emergency situations, and the money from that could help balance the cost of the "public" infrastructure. This is a failure of the government, but equally so of the rich who choose to continue using them for their luxury.
If that were true, there'd be a riot every time a very famous person goes outside for any reason.
I'm sure she'd be approached and photographed and her privacy violated as much as people can get to her in a private lounge, but unless they were to advertise she is going to a certain airport at a specific time, it's incredibly unlikely she'd be mobbed. Ironically, flying publicly would make her movements harder to follow.
She can certainly afford to pay for 10 extra first class tickets for her staff, it'd most likely be much cheaper than owning her own jet. I'm sure the airports would also be thrilled to offer a private entrance and area for her/other famous people to be able to avoid even walking to her VIP lounge. Maybe they could help subsidize the airports instead of average people's taxes paying for their private airports in part.
I've been looking for plexamp alternatives for jellyfin/emby - if you're interested https://symfonium.app/ seems pretty cool (it costs like $5 for a lifetime purchase but has a trial). It also works with Plex.
Jellyfin is a fork of emby from the time when emby went closed source. They are very similar, emby has a similar thing to Plex pass (emby premiere) to monetize for extra features, but it's not enshittified (yet, maybe - who knows).
I'm not sure if it's available without premiere but it has the intro detection and skip feature, which is one of the main things I miss from jellyfin. I also prefer the app on android TV for some small reasons (over jellyfin). I'm not sure if it's overall better, especially if you hadn't already paid for it - I got a lifetime pass on it for cheap once.
Very difficult to predict the future, but my bet would be on no (to the in 20years question).
I doubt the hardware would last 20 years and eventually it'll become hard to source parts as the popularity falls off, even if you could repair it yourself. I'm sure anything with an online dependency will not work either, but offline games have a chance.
But the real question is would you want to use the switch in 20 years (or honestly, even today)? There is already a better alternative (steam deck) with a much more open platform with way more capabilities and I believe it can already emulate Nintendo games (although no first hand experience with that)
I have a switch myself and would never recommend it to anyone personally.
Unless you configure pihole to connect to CF via DoH, the above is still entirely true. Pihole is not a privacy tool, it's a filtering tool.
I used to have this setup too until I realised spending a single hour per year on pihole "costs" me more than paying for a good DNS resolver which can also do the blocking, and I can easily use on my phone as well when I'm away. I'm very happy to have switched, personally.
The above is still true for the upstream regardless, pihole provides filtering - it doesn't replace the privacy provided by using a trusted upstream server and you should still configure pihole to use DoH to the upstream.
Your isp can most likely tell which VPN you're using (unless you also use tor, and even then there's the theories that a lot of it is ran by law enforcement.. depends on how paranoid you are), they will still see the quantity of traffic coming from your home to the VPN and vice versa. All they need to do is to check the IP and they'll likely find it's in use by ... VPN service.
As long as using a VPN is not illegal in your country you can pay for it however you want really (in some places paying with crypto may make it more suspicious than if you just paid for it through PayPal), if law enforcement really wanted to find out the VPN service you use they probably could, the payment would only make it a tiny bit easier.
The key point as mentioned multiple times is to use one you trust, there's no objectively best one, but you'll find a lot of objectively bad ones (for privacy) if you research them. As a start just never use any which are sponsoring YouTube videos or blog articles, pretty much all of those are crap.
VPNs usually route your DNS through them as well, sometimes to other DNS servers but sometimes they just send them to your original DNS server but through the VPN, kinda up to your VPN config - all of the vpn services I've used to date did this, although they were all reputable ones. I'd not recommend to use a questionable VPN though.
Dnssec only verifies authenticity of the server and the integrity of the data, so it helps to prevent man-in-the-middle of DNS, it doesn't provide privacy. Look into DNS over Https (DoH) instead. It provides e2e encryption for your DNS traffic which achieves what dnssec does, but also gives you privacy. DNS over TLS (DoT) also does this, but it runs on a different port so it's easier to block (e.g. if your isp decided they don't like private DNS), while with DoH your DNS traffic looks the same as other web traffic - and afaik it can't be blocked. As above, it's likely this is not needed for use with a VPN, but I'd recommend looking into in general for use even when not on the VPN. Things like controld or nextdns can give you even more peace of mind (although read up on their policies for yourself)
If they forced the maintainer of some FOSS software to merge in some code, even if the maintainer isn't even allowed to speak about it eventually someone would notice (since open source), fork the project and just cherry pick out their crap. Then it's whack-a-mole of trying to keep people from multiplying it.
Or they could claim the software is illegal and have no way to enforce that either.
So basically as long as said software is useful for more than a handful of people, it's infeasible to try to enforce it (e.g. see how it goes every time some software gets a cease and desist, they end up even more popular than before)
Thank you for this, very useful!
Thank you! This is great information.
I use unraid (currently without parity since it's all just stuff I've been okay to lose) with drives I've collected over the years: 2x3TB WD red (one of which is almost 10y old, the other ~7 since it had died once in warranty and got replaced), 1x 12 TB WD red (which is ~3y old).
I was going to add something between another 16-20TB drive depending on the price/TB whenever the next expansion comes up. I've mentioned it in another comment, but I've never used not-new drives and have been fairly shy about them, hence the larger price tag for expansion than expected.
Even if I cut down on my usenet providers/indexers since I've shot a bit overboard with coverage, the cost of realdebrid/alldebrid is still very similar to just the cost of those/year, entirely excluding the cost of disks - hence my interest in feasibility.
This is likely very true, good point. I imagine there is some resilience with there being multiple debrid providers available so worst comes to worst you'd have to pay up for another membership and swap (and I guess hope that the other one still fulfills the purpose).
Findroid is not available for android TV as far as I know so couldn't try it, my other option there would be to use Kodi with a plugin but I've never really been a Kodi user so it's less appealing to me.
It's a bit nitpicky to be fair but:
- chapter API (skip intro/credits), I know it's in the works and there is a plugin but I've found it work much better in Plex (actually emby has this and it's alright)
- the android apps, particularly on TV. I find the jellyfin one somewhat meh for UX. Not huge gripes but just things like how in a list you have to press a button at the top of the screen to display the alphabet shortcut (i.e. jump to all moves starting with a letter). On a TV this is pretty awkward IMO. I know there a bunch of different screens around this, e.g. the one you get with smart screen to go "by letter", or setting the list direction to horizontal allows getting to the button on top easier but it feels clunky to me, so many screens which could be replaced with 1 better designed one.
I do think eventually I'll end up on jellyfin, probably once the chapter API arrives and skipping credits and intro has first party support tho.
Thank you, those are pretty good prices! Have you used recertified drives? I've been fairly scared of used drives so curious if you have and their failure rate compared to new?
You joke but I do actually drink my rum with a few drops of water
I've got https://www.philips-hue.com/en-gb/p/hue-hue-motion-sensor/8719514342125 these for motion sensors and they happen to have luminosity. They get fairly inaccurate once it's relatively dark, plus the fact they're primarily motion sensors
As mentioned above, airport and airlines are heavily subsidized, this includes private airports and jets. For a limo, taxes pay for the road - but everyone can drive on it, so it'd exist with or without them. Maybe a better comparison would be if she had a bus that she travelled in alone, compared to the average person that'd be equally ridiculous.
The emissions of a limo is pretty much in line with the emissions of a family car. Most people wouldn't have a small car and a family car for when they're alone, so even if someone is alone on a limo, they're probably not doing much more harm than the average person.
A private jet's emissions are significantly more per passenger than a commercial plane. Even if a private jet always flies at max capacity - which I'd bet rarely happens - it'll cause significantly more emissions per person than a commercial plane (it's difficult to link a source here as I've not found an exact number. The estimates I've found range between 10 to 43x. Even assuming just 10x that's quite a difference)