Possibly, but you know who has a history of surviving things that would kill any other crew member and has exhibited at least incredible radiation resistance even in that very same episode?
Also, it's very un-starfleet to consider one member of the crew more irreplaceable or valuable than any other, even if it is true.
See, the thing about the 1+1+1 is that they can't all die at ONCE. Even moving at a reasonable clip, let's say that trolley kills say, one person a second. Two people per second already die anyway, so yes, we're increasing the mortality rate, but humanity can survive that, and statistically a lot of people wouldn't end up dying by trolley. It would SUCK that there's a chance you might wind up on the trolley and dead at any time, but dying is already a natural part of life and it happens to everyone at some point anyway, so there's nothing inherently STRANGE about adding a trolley death every second.
The 100 reincarnating people will be suffering FOREVER, repeatedly, with no reprieve or redemption, and the real kicker is all the other people in the other lane are dying ANYWAY, just as people always have, so it's not like you've really SAVED them - you've just not allowed the mortality rate to increase at the cost of eternal suffering for a few people. Doesn't seem like a good trade.
It's a more interesting question if we change it slightly and all of the infinite people are Wolverine, bub.
Is this an "Eventually, Kars stopped thinking" supposition? Because that's a valid possibility, but we can't know it for CERTAIN - nobody's ever been doing anything forever, and chronic pain seems to be painful at least on the timescales of decades....
This assumes the amount of excruciating pain and horror of being run over by a trolley before death is zero, and while I haven't been run over by a trolley personally, I'd have to imagine it's not fun.
...it’s a sign that things are going well, sets the mood sets the tone etc it is a form of sexual communication which is necessary, and not unheard of, when people are dating
Those are your words, not mine. If you didn't MEAN that you should edit your comment.
If that's true I'd hate to see the worst models. It's a great system until Youtube completely changes their recommendation/discovery algorithm and kills your channel, or demonetizes half of it because there's a content rule change, or you get a couple content or copyright strikes filed by a troll and your whole channel and years of your life is suddenly shut down because you can't get a human to verify anything without a lawyer. If you're Mr. Beast or Pewdiepie, Youtube is good for you. If you're a normal creator, it's an absolute nightmare of constant fear about what dystopian changes will be forced on you overnight.
Always someone taking their fandom too seriously I guess.
Also Trump is still an actual candidate and people are rightfully terrified. That does things to people's sarcasm detectors.
Then there are the people who recognize it's a joke/sarcasm and just think it's too serious to joke about, and they're entitled to their opinion. It IS serious, but I will never allow that to get in the way of a joke.
mycodesucks @ mycodesucks @lemmy.world Posts 20Comments 349Joined 1 yr. ago
Oh, absolutely. There are good reasons why that wouldn't be an option.
But those would get in the way of the joke, so I'm choosing to ignore them.