mwguy @ mwguy @infosec.pub

Posts

72

Comments

892

Joined

2 yr. ago

Actually they stopped claiming that during the Bernie-Hillary primaries. It's part of why the candidates

Losing the nomination would not be the end for AOC. But as a champion for the "Democratic Socialist" wind of the Democrats there's really not a better candidate to speak at the primaries and ensure that even in a primary loss the eventual winner adds parts their goals to the administrations goals.

This is why the "Christian Conservatives" always run a few candidates in the Republican party, and why they've always got a spot in the Republican party platform.

She should absolutely run. I don't know if she should win the nomination, but running brings a voice to the wing of the party she represents.

Primaries are about coalition building. And to have your ideas represented by the eventual candidate you need a champion to promote them in the process.

The other is offensive yes.

Militaries tend to do both this things.

Wasn't he openly bragging about regular use of Ketamine a few years ago?

I thought him (and the entire SV "tech bro" scene for that matter) being in drugs was an open secret?

What is the fediverse chat equivalent?

This is the sort of outcome that comes when you hire people who were, "racist before either was cool."

Remember when Microsoft said Windows 10 would be the last Windows? I 'member.

At this moment maybe. But they had, in leave time, more autonomy than Puerto Rico.

Hamas has zero tanks, zero airplanes, zero competence. I'm pretty sure they'd lose a war to a number of New World Cartels. That's not really a real comparison.

Gaza has had autonomy for 20 years.

Well not nobody. Turns out there are some Nazis. /s

When the Ottomans Ruled the area Gaza was primarily a resort town.

Is the capability to block any website something the Democrats want to enable with for Trump to abuse?

On the plus side, apparently we're all women now. So we got that going for us. /s

What image?

What do you mean it didn't happen? That law is working it's way through the Iraqi parliament and is expected to pass because it has broad support. That's not extremist, that's just Islam within 2 standard deviation of the mean.

Edit: forgot to add that it's not a practise anymore except some extremist groups like the taliban and some remote places like in yemen.

This is a bald faced lie.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/women-and-girls/iraq-poised-to-lower-the-age-of-consent-for-girls-to-nine/

Is it Islamaphobic or is it accurate? Iraq, an Islamic Republic is proposing lowering its age of consent to 9. It's a move supported for and suggested by its Islamic clergy.

Maybe you meant to say, "Acknowledging" instead of "Alleging"?