It would be way more impressive if it didn't cost entire nations GDP and fresh water usage to implement.If you throw large enough sum of money on many problems, they will be solved. Yet most AI haven't solved much, they just brute-force things.
Small incremental updates on little tasks mean nothing, the underlying issues are still the same.It has no intelligence, and as such carries big risks.
No, they are spreading lies about shit that doesn't matter as to not lose the hype.If anyone made any significant advance, they would be all over the world.
Any significant shift in the model, or a complete restructuralization of the approach.As it is, it won't grow anywhere.
I have no issue with that, but let's not act like there was anything else other than a trend.If people said 'I got caught up in the moment, everyone was doing it' then fine, you got duped, it happens.But don't give me lame excuses. Most people didn't approach it critically, which is not unusual, but own up to it.I'm tired of the same excuse over and over.And those tests weren't even that cheap.
So what are they going to do after?You won't get tested twice, they still need to pay for existing. After they test everyone, how are they going to keep it up?Unless they take more money from you, they will sell your data to someone else.Insurance companies? Advertisers? Those things provide value for bad actors more than for you.
Don't give me that 'hindsight is 20/20', it was the first thought I had when I heard about this.'How are they going to monetize this?'Either they sell your data, or they go under and... sell your data.There was no other option from the inception.None of this is new, and private companies gobbling up any data they can hasn't been new since at least 2005.
Which chatbots are getting smarter?I know AI has potential, but specifically LLMs (which most people mean when talking about AI) seem to have hit their technological limits.
My wife has this meme for when someone tries to shame her for me liking to play video games and build Legos/Gundam models.
YouTube's new ad strategy is bound to upset users: YouTube Peak Points utilise Gemini to identify moments where users will be most engaged, so advertisers can place ads at the point.
It would be way more impressive if it didn't cost entire nations GDP and fresh water usage to implement.
If you throw large enough sum of money on many problems, they will be solved. Yet most AI haven't solved much, they just brute-force things.