motorwerks @ motorwerks @sopuli.xyz

Posts

0

Comments

57

Joined

2 yr. ago

Sure, common & logical belief, but not how major corporations are allowed to operate under various forms of regulatory bodies across the globe. You may have an opinion, but your opinion holds 0 value. Welcome to the actual world of global commerce. Glad to meet you!

But also, & more likely as suggested above, a Norm MacDonald joke. See here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljaP2etvDc4

1st it's Giuliani w/ money problems, now this guy. If 'actions had consequences' was this obvious, to everyone, all the time the world would be a much better place. Sadly, these are merely the exceptions.

Now make it legal to remove all profiteering by criminal organizations & you've got yourself a winning combination.

I would say it's about as difficult as golfing. Try doing it a few times & maybe you'll hit the ball. Keep at it & you can play the game on a course. Is there a learning curve? Yes, of course. Is it worth it? Yes, of course. Only you get the upside of the effort so nobody is going to do it for you. I mean, unless you pay handsomely for it. In the end...do whatever you feel is appropriate, but getting things that only benefit you w/o effort isn't the world we live in.

I mean, if said item makes it to the banana consumer then I'm OK w/ the plan.

It's not just them, it's everyone, just say different times. The moment the world allowed, & even heralded, wealth extraction over wealth creation everyone lost. Well, not everyone, a small number of people won impressively, like generational wealth levels, but we speak of them fondly. We assign labels like entrepreneur & genius to those folk.

Doing the (insert omnipotent being here)'s work! In these situations I always wonder if there's a page, or something, that I should know about that describes all kinds of format/syntax requirements in 1 place. So, ugh, does that exist?

It's an illusion, Michael!

I guess my point was that consuming bandwidth to stream white noise from a phone that's on for other reasons is a rather efficient use of resources. My assumption was that using running water wouldn't be the retort because A) it's more valuable than electricity & B) there's a pump involved somewhere in the process. I assumed wrong, but we played the game & no harm was done.

Do you know a good way to do it w/o electricity?

It doesn't, nor would anyone choose to return to that paradigm. It may be forced upon society by a critical mass event. I think the more likely result, say 500 years in the future, is that no form of money exists. Think Star Trek. I just think there's too many people & not enough work to continue w/ paid labor that allows the idea of money to persist.

After dealing w/ many Chinese suppliers in various industries I believe the blame falls on the OEM. If you ask for cheap garbage then you'll get that. If you ask for tightly specified designs that are properly designed for the process at a reasonable price then you'll get that.

Correct. Failure in reality doesn't generally imply death. Unless, of course, you're a bank robber. In most other cases it implies learned knowledge that helps your succeed in your current objective. Failing during a job interview, for example, helps you get better at job interviews.

You like diving 12 folders deep to find the file you're after? I feel like there's better, more efficient ways to be organized using metadata, but maybe I'm wrong.

A custom ROM? No. An unlocked bootloader, standard ROM, & custom kernel? Yes.

Hundo P excrement!

And they would have gotten away w/ it if it wasn't for you meddling kids!

Nah, just YOLO & send it! Fuck around & find out is really entertaining for everyone except those that are impacted. The funny part is that those that are impacted are the same to those that voted. Oh no, wait, it's sad. I'm sorry for confusing the situation.

I guess this is where I'd love to have this discussion in person over a drink of your choice because my point, albeit unclear, was that these systems that, on the face of it, "solve crime" shouldn't exist no matter how much 'good' they offer. They have no control &/or limitation to their powers except by the person who decides to use them. I don't see that as manageable. Ultimate power breeds ultimate corruption, if you will. It seems we're at an 'agree to disagree' point & I'm OK w/ that result. Have a good day/week/month & please continue your efforts to healthy debate!