An interesting choice that is. Picking something like Rust would have benefitted them with a big community of open source enthusiasts that could help with contributions
I've been doing this for a few years and eventually got tired of whitelisting websites. I've went as far as using NoScript for fine-grained control, but what's the point? If you need a single feature JS, or a single article on a domain, you will let everything run if you grant the permissions, so why bother?
Better keep JS on and run an up-to-date browser with a custom DNS to filter out known malicious websites. Also, don't visit random links, that's an actually good advice.
The first one is Space Warlord Organ Trading Similator. It's a simple game of trading, well, organs, but it has good soundtrack, nice visuals and different storylines that you reveal through doing quests and accepting/declining incoming transmissions. The game sessions could be really short, so the game is very fitting when you don't know where to spend 10 minutes of your time.
The other one I've been playing is Fallout 2. Super good. It has its bad sides and certainly has a feel of an old game, but if you're an RPG genre fan, definitely give it a try. Although, it requires some level of effort to play it, you can't just load and start mindlessly doing radiant or other simple quests like in Fallout 4, which is a downer for me when I'm tired after work and want to zone out for an hour or two.
Yes, it's practically a low-concentrated poison and the only reason they do that is because the side-effects are outweighted by benefits from clearing the water with it. You wouldn't die from drinking it right away, but if you can, don't.
This is a cross-post from another sub where the OP was downvoted for asking on opinions about that book. Do you mind elaborating on why would you prefer hammering nails into your eyes over reading this?
The writing is very mediocre. It's a decent game with better graphics and more gun variety, but dialogues are so bad they annoy people to the point of losing any desire to play further.
Yup. This is not a rule, of course, and is just my humble observation, but vegans tend to be really agressive about that stuff. You will never be able to propagate your ideas if you pressure people right from the start of the conversation.
You can do that, but Simplex has a limit on the amount of users in a group due to encryption. There is no point in using an e2ee messenger for public announcements
TL;DR: The Ladybird browser, which was written from scratch and aims to be an alternative to corporate-backed browser, now has a non-profit organisation behind it. Also, it got additional funding of 1 million dollars. The end.
I think most people these days don't use browser bookmarks as a "check this out later" tool, and instead as more of a "I frequently need to access this page" function.
So what's preventing those people from using bookmarks as "check this out later" tool? The personal preference of using an app that reinvented those same bookmarks? Just create a "read-it-later" later directory and boom, you're good to go.
Also, "read later" apps generally strip the web page formatting and advertisements, and usually have an offline function of some sort; both of which you typically can't do with bookmarks.
Yeah, because these are features typically provided by your browser. Hence, browser bookmarks. It's not a unique feature to read-it-later apps in any way.
Yup. It's a mod for Fallout 4. See the official Release page: https://fallout4london.com/release/