cum @ moon @lemmy.cafe

Posts

0

Comments

727

Joined

2 yr. ago

I agree, but if you want js off while web browsing, you're already in that advanced tech circle and are a part of that demographic.

https://html.duckduckgo.com/html/

You've replied to like 5 other of my comments the exact same thing at this point. Like I replied to the other guy, my comment is not saying you can't set up a VPN without an app, even though that's a very rare method of doing so regardless. Apple is literally a closed garden, that does not change anything lol.

Also no, like I said in my other comment, you can't side load. What you think is a "gotcha" is that there's a work around where you register a developer account and load an unofficial application that way. You know very well yourself that Apple does not want you sideloading, and this is not meant for consumer applications, and that it is easily blockable at any point by Apple. That is why the EU is constantly hitting Apple with anti-trust and anti-competition lawsuits. This has literally been proven in court, it is not an opinion. You are being incredibly bad faith for no reason. Apple does not want you sideloading, Android does.

Also AOSP is not Google. Though in reality, Google phones tend to support alternative operating systems the best. Even if that stopped being the case and they went locked down suddenly, there are still tons of other Android manufacturers out there that can have their bootloader unlocked and run their entirely own degoogled ecosystems. So you should probably know what you're talking about, but you think this is a brand vs brand debate or something. It's not, Android is simply designed around side-loading, is officially supported, and intended by consumers. iOS is not. It's not complicated.

Bro I hope Apple is paying you for all the white knighting you're doing for them. To side load on Apple, you have to create a developer account and treat it as if you're developing an app. That is borderline exploiting it and definitely not intended to be used for regular consumer applications. For all intents and purposes, you can't side load on Apple because this is not intended nor recommended for anyone, and is easily blocked by Apple if they ever choose to do so.

You're being blatantly bad faith to compare that to Android where you can simply download an apk, open it, and press install. It's entirely supported and intended by Android's design. Android goes so far to support seamless updates for third party app stores, and extends their app malware scanner to side loaded apks as well.

If you consider those two to be the same, then you're just in bad faith and not worth taking seriously, and are looking to argue for the sake of arguing. Apple is not your friend. They do not want you side loading, and you know this.

Imagine thinking that's the same thing as Android's side loading support. The cope is real.

How does he simply get to choose not to pay back his debts? Like how is this shit optional??

Where did you read that I said iOS doesn't support adding VPNs?

My message is clearly talking about side loading. Don't twist my words.

This is why you don't buy into closed-garden ecosystems like this. If you're on iOS, there's nothing you can do about it, you're at their mercy. Android has great support for side loading. There's really only one choice if you care about freedom.

uh what are you even talking about?? It has block-buster console sellers like Concord

I'll disagree with most of this thread and say it somewhat does, because your views and biases are heavily influenced by your gender. So if genders are all the same, you're just going to have a circlejerk. Is there something we should do about it? No, but I feel recognizing that it plays a big factor in a community is important.

I doubt it'd have anything malicious in the firmware. I'd be more concerned about getting ripped off with fake parts or having it break on you.

u can't just ask that

Probably one of the most in-touch devs with their community and they've been super transparent and consistent throughout their entire early access journey. They basically showed how early access should be done in the best possible way. Been playing 1.0 for awhile but am a bit intimidated knowing I need to rebuild my trash 'factories' lol.

"allowed too" 🙄

Thx I'll sell you it as an nft

Looks like that's basically what's happening now that I looked into it more. Like I believe the "hide" user button is the same (idk I haven't been on the site forever lol), and the block basically blocks interaction but doesn't hide it. Honestly makes sense because you could see the user who blocked you if you simply clicked a thread link in private browsing.

Like if you replied and blocked me on Lemmy, I could still open the thread in incognito or whatever and see the whole public thread but not reply to you. Seems actually reasonable tbh, since the blocker and block-ee doesn't lose or gain anything they couldn't already do already.

tcp

That's the opposite of what's happening. In this case, Musk would have blocked you, and you would want to see his posts (for some reason). You could normally see a user who's blocked your posts by just opening the thread in an incognito tab to view as a logged out user. This just cuts out that step and lets you see the user's posts without doing that.

That makes no sense. You can filter them out of your feed pretty easily, but they'll still be able to interact with you and of course bring a lot of new toxic users to you. Your browser can't do anything about that, it's entirely Twitter's side.

Ability to actually find interesting content. I want an algo, but at this point I want more of what Bluesky does but for Mastodon.