Yeah, hate this. To everyone saying it's not corporate: or certainly is. I did B2B work for around a hundred corps through the one I worked at and I heard it at probably 70% of them.
It's just the company trying to control literally every part of your life. Like who gives a shit what I do on my break? That, and you can't get an "extra" break later saying you have to pee.
Your point doesn't necessarily disagree with the OP point. OP is saying that the simulation was supposed to be realistic but had glitches that people interpreted as magic.
Having been new on both weapons and also having trained people that were brand new on both weapons, I will say that most beginners cannot hit something that far away with anything. What I meant by "intuitive" is that if you miss with a bow, you can see exactly where the arrow went and if it's too low you can be like "I need to shoot a little higher". Sometimes it is harder when you're firing ammunition because they tend to disappear.
Loading either weapon isn't necessarily complicated, but it is more intuitive on a bow. For revolver you will need to pull the release, rotate the assembly out, remove old rounds, insert new rounds and reverse disassembly. For a bow, you just put an arrow in and pull it back because the previous arrow is already gone. For some firearms, loading correctly can be fairly tricky if you don't know what you're doing. For example, if you load an M16 and don't remember to shake the rounds to the back of the magazine, it can jam the weapon.
If my food sucks and the service was good, I tip them specifically in cash and tell them not to mention it, so it looks like I didn't tip to the restaurant but it doesn't screw the wait staff. It also makes the restaurant pay just a tiny bit more in payroll.
Bows are simpler logistically. Nock an arrow, pull, aim, release ("fire"). Guns have more steps up front typically but also make the round-to-round process simpler.
Both have sights that are comparable in complexity.
Form is similarly important for both.
Skill curve is similar for both at the higher end. I think bows are a little more intuitive for beginner through novice (subjective of course).
Size can vary wildly for both.
Bows need more physicality typically, so they're a little harder in that way.
Feel free to follow with questions if you like. I have some hobby experience with bows and have trained professionally (military) with firearms.
Linux seems catered for the most basic users (grandma) and extremely advanced users (Linux enthusiasts, programmers). I'm in the middle where I'm pretty good on a computer but not that into the tweaking and tuning. I don't think my demographic is catered to very well.
There's a LOT of super cool stuff on Linux but a lot of it is buried on GitHub and needs configuration to work right. 1, I don't have time to find that stuff and 2, I don't care enough usually to make it work even though I typically could with sufficient effort.
Sometimes you can be the hug they never got when they were a little kid and their fuckhead dad beat them instead of letting them be gay (or whatever authentic self got crushed).
I'm not saying you should put a huge amount of work into this but sometimes being kind and meeting someone where they're at even if they're super wrong does more to break the mold than to be a dickhead back. These people have a lot of experience doubling down to resistance, and if you surprise them with kindness it can shake up the whole setting.
That said, if you're kind and try to teach them, and they're still bastards/non-receptive, then move on and change the minds you can. Don't waste your time on people that don't want it.
I personally would tally this up as "12%" rather than "24%".
Or at least in my opinion, option "D" (bad person that did some good things) is most likely the closest to an objective answer and "E" (completely bad) is a totally acceptable summary. But both D and E both summarize Hitler as bad. The people summarizing him as "balanced" or "good" totaled to 12%.
That's not fair phrasing and will lead to high numbers.
Hitler wasn't "all" bad technically, he was just so bad that the good shouldn't matter at all. Pushing forward technology (VW Beetle, Autobahn) should is no way be justified by genocide (obviously).
A better question would have been something like "do you like Hitler overall?"
EA just opened sourced the real RA as well!