mononomi @ mononomi @feddit.nl

Posts

5

Comments

143

Joined

2 yr. ago

Ik hou zo erg van dit soort Nederlandse straatjes 😍

After reading his name, I don't think he's helping voluntarily

Wow wat is de Europese Unie lekker bezig!

Ha kids, een mooi voorbeeld. Ik denk dat er steeds meer Engelse leenwoorden komen. Engels is nu wat Frans vroeger was voor de elite, desondanks bestaat Nederlands nog steeds! En de meeste Nederlanders zijn helemaal niet zo goed in engels, dus t komt wel goed

Now breaks my klomp

These shirts are amazing

Anybody know an article about this? Can't find it and really curious about the backstory

fr fr

Haha yeah okey, but I was looking more towards smaller things to do in the evening. Hobby sounds way more committed, but from these responses it seems like it doesnt need to be. Thanks anyway!

This is amaziiiing. Such a great response! Thank you, I recognize a lot! I will go running right after finishing this comment ;) Will also definitely try the audio books to get unhooked while eating.

I thought bender was wearing apple glasses for a split second

What has happened to me

Need it for food 7/10

Oh it was fine to begin with, looks extra crisp now for sure.

Damn, interesting! And that chemist sounding name sure does add extra credibility

Just thought about this, isn't it a bit silly that we all use milli Ah while all the values are above the thousands? Like, 5000 mAh is just 5 Ah

Looks a bit orange mate. Desert dust by any chance?

City people these days don't even know how wool is produced tss

Nah sorry just kidding around, I think you stumbled upon a classic philosophical problem. You cannot 100% truly know that your senses are correct. I agree with ChatGPT on pragmatism here: you can try proving it all you want, you will never get there. Better to just look at all those pretty flowers nature created in this weird universe!

The philosophical question you're raising is known as solipsism, which is the idea that one can only be sure of the existence of their own mind and not of anything external to it. While it's an interesting concept to explore, proving the absolute reality of the external world can be challenging.

Philosophers have debated these questions for centuries, and there isn't a definitive answer. However, there are some common responses and arguments:

Pragmatism: While you might not be able to prove the absolute reality of the external world, it is generally more practical and beneficial to assume its existence. The way we navigate and interact with the world is based on the assumption that it is real.

Consensus Reality: The fact that multiple people can agree on the existence of certain things suggests a shared reality. If others can perceive and interact with the same objects or events as you do, it adds weight to the argument that there is an external reality.

Scientific Method: Science provides a systematic way of understanding the world through observation, experimentation, and verification. While it may not provide absolute certainty, the scientific method has proven to be a reliable way to gain knowledge about the external world.

Testability: While you may question the authenticity of your perceptions, you can still make predictions and test them against your experiences. For example, if you drop an object, you can predict that it will fall, and when it does, it provides some validation of the external reality.

Regarding your doubt about whether people are real or if the responses are from AI, the same principles can apply. If there is consistency in responses, coherence in conversations, and a shared understanding among users, it adds credibility to the reality of the interaction.

It's important to note that these responses don't necessarily provide absolute certainty but offer practical and reasonable ways to engage with the external world. The nature of reality is a complex and debated topic in philosophy, and there may never be a conclusive answer.

Told him to not jump ¯(ツ)_/¯ Was kinda curious if he'd manage though

Yours isn't?