I'm not attacking anyone and I'm not defending anyone. I'm asking what the fuck people who say I'm not doing enough are doing.
I'm doing what I can to help with the symptoms of this and protect the vulnerable people I know of, but I don't think there's much I can do about the actual ongoing coup but goddamn it I'll try. A lot of my good friends are being hurt by this situation already and I can't do all that much about it myself. I see a lot of posts complaining that nobody is doing anything about the situation coming from people who aren't doing anything about the situation and asking me to do more than I am about the situation. I want the people who complain to be putting in some legwork or else not bemoaning that nobody else is.
"Nobody is showing up to protests. Fucking liberals who think voting was enough." Says the fella who has never been to a protest.
"Won't somebody do something?" Begs the person who has never called their reps.
Etc.. Insert your own example here.
All I'm saying is that there's a lot of complaining where there could be calls to action by people who aren't doing much themselves. It hurts to have someone ask "yeah but what are you doing?" When people want to vent but I think maybe people should have that question at top of mind even if it makes venting less effective.
Oh boy. Corruption for sure. Not like hush money or Epstein corruption. Like private party and excessive stunt corruption. Are you saying I could fund stupid shit? The zip line industry would boom. Adverts for spider cars would be everywhere. So much money would go into anti-fossil fuel propaganda.
Sorry if you think I'm heated. I'll tone it down. I really tend to overuse expletives for emphasis. I want to be clear that I understand you. However, I think that "equality in it's highest form" is some kind of platonic magic that doesn't exist in the reality we live in and is completely irrelevant to any of this. Like, it's pretty ridiculous to remove context from a situation and just blanket "equality" on something. Your version is some really thoughtless black and white stuff that could use maybe a minute of consideration. Like treating someone without legs the same as someone who can walk and forgoing ramps because that's equality in the highest form. "With no negatives" would require the legless fella to have legs. And would that require giving them legs to achieve equality? What about the legged people who didn't get a hugely expensive surgery? Is equality giving them cash to equal that out? I'm saying it's actually always complicated. Equality with context (and even really really simple thought) concludes that treating everyone equally means treating some people differently. Because, y'know, you can't ask a paraplegic to use the stairs in most cases.
But I'm mostly just responding to inform and explain in case there's any chance of education or open mindedness and it seems like we're not getting anywhere.
No context needed? So like the narrowest scope for equality? Like you want straight people to be treated as lesser? Killed in other countries? Or maybe context would help with that type equality. Let's make the straights experience what the lgbtqia+ people did/do and that's equality.
Anyway, equality is great but we ain't even fucking there yet. Give the LGBT peeps their pride and celebration in the places where they won't be fucking killed for it. If I would be killed for having six toes in Australia and had just recently made it closer to being treated like another person in my own country I'd celebrate the shit out of my sixth toe all the god damn time. When someone comes to my six toe party/game/whatever with five toes, who cares. Live and let live. I'm celebrating with my six toed goblet and my six toed hat. When they show up and ask for a five toed goblet because it's only equal I'd probably make fun of them for having absolutely no understanding of what's being celebrated or why and tell them they could have one for a million dollars or whatever too. But I'm sure the straight name tag and recognition is 'equally' meaningful to straight people, right?
So I guess setting equality as the goalpost is fine. But I just don't think that straight people are really all that into having recognition for being straight. And I don't think that LGBT want straight people to be treated worse in order to achieve equality. So maybe not the best goalpost but it's close. Fish and birds have very different needs and equality is not really going to make it better without a lot of nuance.
Like the guy on fire begging for water doesn't deserve it more than you but if you point at him and say "no fair what about equality" it kind of ignores all the important context and makes you look like a dick.
Boy howdey that sure is vague. Where did I say I'm not a factor anyway?