mmddmm @ mmddmm @lemm.ee

Posts

0

Comments

336

Joined

5 mo. ago

Yeah, the Claude logo was obviously inspired by Community.

Just as much as the Apple AI one is a copy of the OpenAI.

The Free World uses km/h.

Seems like you are from the US.

As much as "left" and "right" carry any meaning anywhere, in your country those words have been redefined to the point they are completely meaningless.

If you have any left-leaning organized political movement, it never makes the news. You only have extreme right.

Also, Denmark subsides are probably in Euros. So it's already 5% higher just on Trump's first 3 months.

So it's the original developers that answer the questions in Stack Overflow? Good to know.

Yes, the ability to see very far away does imply in very large eyes if you define "see" by properly focusing on the objects. But not large pupils, what matters is the size of the eyes lenses, on the bare front of them.

But no, he could be able to perceive those stuff without the larger eyes if he had a good mental model of how the horsemen interfere with the background (what is probably easier than it seems, because they would be moving), and how their hair would interfere with the previous outline.

Frequency-dependent connectors could work, but would be seriously counter-intuitive to work with.

And it would still benefit for taking a week to formally define its interface before Linus started coding.

Also, basic is famous for being already fully specified and mostly stolen from other people's work.

Yes, it's because despite the problem being the same for everybody, the "treatment" has to be very different. So it's better if you break it down into two different epidemics.

And one gets more attention because every single well known and applied procedure to fight the epidemics don't work for them.

On gold connectors... Are you afraid your signal will reflect back into the antenna? Do people really do that?

But yeah, also you can make sure it resonates on the correct frequency by mechanically adjusting it and looking for the feedback.

Yes, it's the obvious extension from what we have now, and quite coherent for explaining some universe that isn't the one we live in.

It just shouldn't have monopolized theoretical physics for a generation. It's really hard to imagine something different, but this is even more reason to celebrate the people trying that, not to shun then and focus on what you already have.

It's not either. Those things companies are trying to sell you out there and CEOs are ordering you to use unambiguously suck.

Oh, a song from the time superstrings were still cool?

They had tails.

Yeah, it's because of the tariffs people. There are only the tariffs, there's nothing else to see here. Move along.

India makes a huge amount of drugs. The UK probably just doesn't import them.

Hum... Putting them in quotes is nice, it reminds people of the claim.

I think the best would be to also explain in parenthesis, like: "reciprocal" (unilateral)

Those terms don't have definitions. People use them twice on the same phrase where each occurrence has a different meaning.

Or swearwords, or any word that is partially composed of a swearword. Or talk about people that are pro-China or pro-Russia engaging in any kind of bad behavior in other places that have no relation to ML.

I'm sure the list continues, but I blocked them a while ago.

Or machine learning. Pick your poison.

Or be like Chomsky and despise both while you secretly create papers on those areas.