mmcintyre @ mmcintyre @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

96

Joined

2 yr. ago

But how? Democrats have been trying to get the media to discuss what they want when they want for like 4 decades now. Mainstream media has decided it's on the side of business and Dems are bad for that (I disagree, but then I'm not a CEO, just someone who can read a chart), so how do you get them talking about the benefits of (D) actions instead of just the drawbacks they want to highllight in the 3 minute segment they only agreed to just to show how unrealistic or expensive or whatever they think those actions are?

Never suffered any inconvenience? Like, have you seen how she travels? But also..

What expertise do you need to say "stop adding carbon to the atmosphere" at this point? Everyone lives here, we all should have something to say about what is inevitably coming down the pike - especially the young. You just come across as someone who has everything to lose wanting those with nothing to lose to sit down, shut up, buckle up, and just be grateful for the ride to whatever hell we're heading to.

Yeah, but that stereotype was only because we didn't have families or places of our own to take care of yet. We got older and almost all of us (not me, tho) joined the race alongside everyone else.

He would have had to have to focus his criming on one criminal act, in one jurisdiction. He's crimed all over the place, in a variety of ways. The legal systems are just responding to that. I don't know how you expect crimes in Georgia to be ignored because he's committed crimes in New York, for example.

American revolution didn't successfully throw off colonizers. In any kind of way.

Wow.

I can't imagine what could possibly have turned you from being interested in how this all started and who we ought to really place the blame on into just trying to be the biggest dipshit.

Are you just too young to remember libtard, feminazi, etc? Or are you deliberately telling lies to craft some kind of narrative where the side you support is the poor put upon victim that couldn't possibly be expected to have responsibility for a god damned thing?

All of them are caused by idiot Republicans being idiots would be my guess!

But google says 21 of them in the last 5 decades, or 14 since 1980, or 4 since 2010.. depending on the article and how far you want to go back.

Good luck trying to convince anyone there's lots of Americans who A) didn't even have a single tattered shred of concern regarding Trump family members' unchecked corruption while being actual White House advisers and B) are actually very concerned about the wealthy getting away with shit.

I mean you're gonna need Trump levels of salesmanship to get anyone to buy that, and it just don't seem like you've got it. Y'all never do. Thank goodness.. one Trump is more than enough.

And "privileged minority"? Like, Jesus fucking Christ my guy.

What does 'in loco parentis' mean?

Ok, if they were confining that to Hamas maybe it would be good news. But how many Palestinians were "eliminated" on the way to delivering you your "good news". How many dead children? How many doctors, teachers, drivers, grandparents have been eliminated to bring you this good news?

I just don't think that Israeli lives are any more or less important than Palestinian lives. So murdering 30,000 Gazans doesn't seem like remotely good news to me.

But then again I'm not a bloodthirsty bigot.

Palestine doesn't even have an army. What war are you talking about?

This is more a "special military operation" as retaliation for a terrorist attack. Because this ain't a war, it's a massacre of mostly innocent people. I mean.. they're literally targeting children. And the ambulance trying to reach them.

How?

In what kind of way is trying to get a president to change his mind on helping to destroy Gaza and its people anything like bringing in a bunch of Young Republicans to stop counting legitimate votes in order to steal an election?

Like, even just on vibes alone.. how?

That's not what racism is.

Israel isn't killing Hamas. They are killing Palestinians. Thousands of children. And starving those still breathing. But apparently wanting more Gazans (and others in Gaza) killed is a totally cool and normal thing, and really.. how gauche of me to mention it!

Maybe Netanyahu shouldn't have helped stand Hamas up in the first place if them being on their feet is such a problem.

You say it makes no sense to stop murdering Palestinian children unless Hamas releases hostages. Like, shooting children is a no-brainer.

What makes you or Netanyahu any better than Hamas?

Literally nothing.

There is no logic to bombing, starving, shooting a population that doesn't even have hostages.

Sorry you enjoy murdering children vicariously

Of course I looked it up, I'm not about to get on here and spew bullshit like some ignorant jerkwad.

Dude, I own a pool. What do you think a burkini is made out of, wool?

I don't understand how wearing a burkini defeats the point of the shower. A burkini is swimwear.