mke @ mke @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

220

Joined

1 yr. ago

It's always interesting to see random activities highlight how different people's lives can be. As of the time I'm posting this, half of the comments mention a dishwasher.

I've never been in a house with a dishwasher, and literally just realized I couldn't tell you if I've ever seen one, outside of a screen. To my perception, they're like a magical tool that supposedly exists... somewhere. Maybe.

That's not a complaint, and not really noteworthy. I'm pretty sure most of humanity doesn't have one, after all. I just think it's funny when you stumble into another bubble, inside your bubble.

I know that I, too, enjoy things that don't seem real to someone else. Even being able to read this post is a privilege. Now, that's funny.

That's a shame, thank you for the input. I guess I could try Bluesky instead.

Not sure how up to date you are on Bluesky's situation, but it might interest you to know they've recently started doing early-access federation. It's... not ideal (opinion), but it's moving along (fact).

While I agree with you, I just want to mention that not necessarily all fediverse users have a formed opinion (at least at first) about open platforms, sharing content with other websites, and so on.

Some people just suffered from platforms like ex-Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Tumblr, etc. enshittifying, heard that other victims were trying to build something better, and (generously, might I add) decided to give it a chance.

That doesn't excuse any horrible behavior they might've engaged in. But remember that just because someone is surprised and reacts negatively at how their content is handled on the fediverse, that doesn't mean they were in the wrong to join.

Folks can jump into things without fully understanding them, and sometimes it's nice to, circumstances allowing, take that as an opportunity to inform, rather than question "Why are you even here?"

There's quite a bit to unpack in this article, even if some of it is only mentioned.

It's a saddening read. There are issues with Fediverse culture and surrounding technical discussion at wide, but also with interactions between law and new technologies like ActivityPub—and that's on top of the law, on it's own, already doing a horrible job way too often, in my opinion. None of this is news, but it always hurts a little to be reminded so.

I've been thinking about trying to get into mastodon, to form my own opinion on several topics it intersects with. I'm a little uncomfortable with how popular it is compared to other fediverse software, considering how poorly they seem to integrate. I hoped some time on mastodon would dispell this feeling, or at least give me insights I could work with. To be honest, every day it gets a little harder to justify that idea.

But that's just a personal thing. Maybe I'm simply not fit for micro-blogging. Really, I don't care which software is the most popular, I literally just wish they'd integrate better. Despite my misgivings, I'm grateful for the positive impact mastodon has made in the social/tech circles, changing how many people see social media and their relationship with it.

The us-versus-them mentality is unreal. The only valid them, to me, is proprietary closed platforms. We should strive for more decentralized networks that shift control over user experience back to its users, because we need and deserve safer, healthier social networks. This is not it. I can only hope culture will improve, because I'm not sure how you'd tackle a problem on this scale.

And if mastodon can't fix itself? Screw it, and keep an eye on what comes next.

It's not a competition, we're in a team effort to build a part of the internet that can resist enshittification inevitable in closed platforms; so long as the platform is open, I'll keep my mind open as well. If my lemmy instance decides to migrate to Sublinks, that's fine. Worst case, I'll migrate elsewhere. Assuming Bluesky turns out OK as a company, even atproto taking the lead over ActivityPub might be fine. Hell, some of the original AP creators are still experimenting with new ideas.

I fully agree with the point that too many people act like the fediverse, or their specific brand of it, is more open-minded and kinder than what they're trying to replace. I hope it's possible to make that true, one day.

P.S. Sorry, brevity is the soul of wit, and I'm an idiot. This ended up as an outlet for issues that have been frustrating me for a while.

media file downloaded from a dubious source with an extension you've never seen before

VLC: "Let me play it."

It just works.

I used to enjoy fireship, but a particularly disappointing video soured the channel to me significantly.

It was about something bad Google was doing to the web/chrome (the list's so big at this point that I can't recall what) and it hit me how, despite the humorous nature of the content, that video was how many people were being seriously introduced to the issue... and it neglected to even mention Firefox. Imagine informing people of a looming threat, yet forgetting to mention one of the best tools against it. Genuinely baffling.

There's more to it, but it's been a while and my memory was never the best. All that remains now is a general feeling of "Oh darn, this guy's videos can be irresponsibly superficial, sometimes." Maybe that's just par for the course with such content creators, which race to be the first out the door with the news™, but mistakes, however small, had long been adding up over time and eroding my trust in the source. That video just happened to be the last straw.

I don't mean to criticize you or others who enjoy the videos, though. Just wanted to remind folks to be careful with where and how they get their info. Hopefully, this uncalled for rant will inspire passersby to be a bit more mindful of the content they consume.

P.S. obligatory screw nintendo :^(

Php also graced us with Unexpected T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM

People interested in these topics might also be interested in taking a look at how Zig handles some of them, for added perspective. I don't necessarily agree with all of the project lead's ideas re: open-source funding, but I believe it's worth knowing they exist.

I will attempt an oddly serious answer, unlike my previous comment, since I feel this deserves one.

Sort of, and technically correct. Both the suicidal and the oil baron have no reason to care what happens after they're dead. But I don't know if that's relevant here.

Powerful people ruining the world do so because of incentives and... because they can. The only thing that will stop them and those that come after is meaningful societal change. Convincing people to participate in bringing about this change is important too, make no mistake, but it's because of what they can achieve united. It's voting, protesting, and building a world where the powerful can't screw over the world and everyone in it.

Hoping a change in culture alone will save the world is useless, because the rich and powerful will not follow that new culture. There's no trickle-up morals, and telling suicidal people they should be mindful of how they die (if serious) is barking up the wrong tree. It won't stop the oil baron from continuing to pollute more than everyone in this thread combined, nor will it make a meaningful difference even should the person follow your advice, because it's a drop in the bucket---and maybe the last one they'll ever make.

Trying to put it shortly, my point is that mentality is only the start. The world is broken (e.g. climate change is a thing), not just because of mentality, but because those high above do all in their power to stay there and shape the world in ways that suit them. Changing people's mentality is good, but is "use hydrogen instead of helium" really the last thing a suicidal person should have to hear from you?

Of course, this is a meme community in the end, so apologies if this comment was unnecessary because no one is seriously saying that. But anyone who thinks so should also be able to read my previous comment in its intended humor as well.

Respectfully, the dead need not care about loss of non-renewable resources.

Would replacing "shitty" with "crappy" make it better? I didn't take telling it to a five year old literally and assumed uncle's was for (even) edgier jokes. I don't mind moving the post at all, though.

Edit: no internet for a while, will leave post up for now and leave it to moderators' discretion. Will check back later and remove if that's what seems best.

Edit2: yeah it's about time I let my stand-up comedy dream rest, among other things

I think they're just keeping up the banter. As in, humourously acting like they don't get your point just to keep the joke going ("So what if you're a girl? That's clearly you rn, just replace them with a short girl. Or are you saying girls cannot study the blade?"). Supporting that idea is the fact that "Study the blade" is a relatively well known internet meme at this point.

But I'm just an unrelated individual inserting myself into a random conversation with little reason, trying to interpret another person's comment on a shitposting community.

I completely understand. Though I rarely watch it nowadays, I'm much the same. Sometimes I'll make an exception when I hear the dubbed version is worth it.

My bad, I misunderstood your previous comment as saying you could only watch in your native language.

Searching a bit, I found an old blogpost explaining how to filter Netflix content so it only showed stuff available in English. So I assume it isn't (or at least wasn't) that they only show content dubbed in your language.

However, from my understanding, dubbing is quite popular. Especially so in Germany, or so say my 10 minutes of superficial research into the topic.

Netflix may simply noticed that dubbed was the more popular option by a significant margin and accordingly decided to invest a lot into making shows available with dubs, or not "waste" money making them available at all.

I know very little about this topic, do not take this as fact. One possible reason is licensing issues. It's a mess. Not an unsolvable one, but one that pirates usually don't have to deal with.

Coincidentally, I was struggling and wishing I could do something similar a few days ago. Didn't know Windows could do it, that's awesome. I think, ideally, more software should accept pasting an image in input fields, without even the need to open a file picker. But the file picker handling URLs sounds cool as well.

You're not the person I replied to, but thanks for sharing :^)

Sorry, meant to reply sooner.

I don't know what your environment looks like, and I wouldn't try to fix it anyway—that's out of scope for a lemmy comment. I do want to mention some info that might be interesting/relevant for people reading this thread:

• The GTK file chooser, if that's what you're using, already has better file previews.
• Sadly, programs won't always use the best method available to do things. While Upscaler gives me nice image previews in the file picker, my installation of Firefox hasn't even updated it to GTK 4.
• Portals seem to be a good step towards more uniform and predictable user experiences.
  • "[...] any application can use portals to provide uniform access to features independent of desktops and toolkits."
• Point being, better things exist and are on their way. Adoption is slow, but we're getting there.
• ...And on a semi-related note, if you have previews for certain file types, but not for others, check if you're missing a package. That took one search and one command to fix something that'd been bothering me for weeks.

Exact issues and how bad they are depend heavily on your setup, such as which desktop environment you use and which software (& versions) you have installed. That seems to be a common description of UX problems in the Linux ecosystem, I wonder why :^)))

But hopefully I managed to spread some positivity(?) about the state of things and where we're going.

Just curious, what are your issues with the current available options?

My bad, I forgot you need to be careful using such metaphors when talking about software. It's as the other commenter said: a rebrand, but they might keep the old identity around for people who like it.

What apps you install depends on your needs and preferences. It might help others if you include those in any future requests for suggestions.

I suggest not worrying too much about "removing your dependence on closed ecosystems" immediately. Just do as you did before, changing apps as you find better alternatives---only, this time, considering the advantages of FOSS. Simply by giving F-droid apps a chance before opening (I assume) the Play Store, you're already doing better than the vast majority of people.

Regarding discoverability and security, I believe participation in the community helps:

• The Venn diagram of "FOSS app users" and "software enthusiasts" is closer to a circle. People like talking about useful, good software they like. Word of mouth recommendations is how I got into this stuff.
• You'll be more likely to hear urgent actionable news (e.g. X app developer sold to bad company, here's the fork that will carry the torch onwards).

And so that this comment isn't completely useless... Mozilla are currently working on a mobile version of Thunderbird for Android, built on top of K9 mail. Been using the beta and liking it so far. If you want a FOSS e-mail app, keep an eye on that one.

P.S. I much prefer the dark side, and don't forget the cookies!