misteloct @ misteloct @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

202

Joined

4 mo. ago

Welp I learn something every day. Thanks for sharing.

It is universal. I guarantee you Obama would agree 100% with a European style single payer system, which is what I think you mean.

One such review of evidence of what I'm saying that contradicts your argument:

https://sdvoice.info/trump-lost-vote-suppression-won-here-are-the-numbers/

Too many logical fallacies in your comment to reply without losing your attention span but I'll try.

Eligible voters were removed, the link proves it. Quasilegal because it's a gray area in the law, here's litigation against the practice but only in some states and inconsistently, hence "quasi": https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/mass-purges-are-new-voter-suppression. Not controversial: a strange lie, of course it's controversial, most people don't believe your argument. People didn't want to vote for Trump in China/India, that is more relevant than your argument as I've said before you circled back. No one cheated: false, again.

If that evidence is unconvincing, what evidence would you need to see to convince you? Would any evidence convinced you or do you choose to believe without caring about reality?

Upvoted because truth. Lol.

There are many reasons for an election win or loss. But the big one we care about in 2024 was widespread purging. It's quasilegal, there's evidence of it, it's cheating, and it suppresses Democrat votes much more.

There were 7 billion people who didn't immigrate into the US and thus didn't vote, they were very clear as to why they didn't come to America. That's just as relevant as your 90 million, actually more because it's 100x the people! Don't get me started on extraterrestrials we didn't find, there could be trillions. It was clear the reasons we didn't fund SETI.

"Vandalizing isn't vandalizing". You made no argument here.

Me:

<a reasonable argument followed by empathy>

You: Twat!

Lol. It's fine, I give you permission to keep your anger at all Americans. It's actually probably better that way, we deserve it.

Legal becomes a meaningless term then. If we can define words however I want my definition is equal.

A strawman, Republicans claimed election fraud (2 + 2 = 5), Democrats claimed voter suppression disproportionately affects them (2 + 2 = 4). What do you think 2 + 2 = ?

You think that violent insurrection against our country by storming the capitol is the same as vandalizing a few cars? How long do you think the sentences should be for each crime? I'd say one is 100x the sentence of the other.

So being "legal" is meaningless then?

If the law is arbitrary then everything is legal.

I'm legitimately confused. Why is this different than Jan6ers who were pardoned? I thought violent insurrection/protest was legal since Jan 6 2021. ELI5.

It's also illegal in some places to bring an orange into a bathtub, we use common law in the US so citing civil law statutes is not a valid argument.

I know you're a Russian shill based on your comment history, your home country follows civil law so perhaps that's confusing to you.

Yes, Jan 6 murders were very wrong. Tesla vandals are morally superior, I agree wholeheartedly.

I see, you're in Canada. I'm an American. You don't understand my fear. You only have to deal with tariffs, I mean that sucks but my government is literally turning fascist, you get to just buy Canadian and move on. You don't and can't know what that's like... Don't try unless you plan to sympathize.

Well at least I'm glad you don't understand my fear. If you did you'd be in our position.

Also nice job not insulting me, I counted 3 but it's ok I think you're angry. I'm angry too. Don't be angry at me though. Be angry at the bully, not the victim.

US History: 1774-2025.

Important to remember this when we consider the relative morality of Tesla vandals. So far I haven't heard of anyone getting hurt so I think it's pretty mild.

Republicans won because of voter suppression and purging. What you're saying is "Pants on fire" rewriting of history. Also Jan6ers were much, much more violent so I think Democrats are simply trying out their fascism strategy.

Vandalizing Teslas is legal, the precedent was set when Jan6ers were pardoned. So your morality argument is wrong too.

Flipping off people didn't work, it got the left wing threats of being sent to an El Salvadorean prison. I don't approve or disapprove of the Tesla vandals but you bet your ass it's working. It's sad that it works and I hate it.

But here's you with a Republican dick in your mouth: "Stop fighting guys, gargle"

It is directly hurting the person doing the actual harm. It's not the vandals' fault that he used innocents as his human shield.

Left: 2+2=4 Right: 2+2=5 Center: 2+2=4.5 (You: "Both sides have good things to offer!")