No, I'm not saying that at all. That's not how hypotheticals work. If their hypothesis is that a better democratic candidate exists, then that candidate must be a better candidate than Biden. I do agree that your idea of an imaginary candidate is, indeed, stupid.
200 kcals is like 1/10 of the average person's daily intake, so maybe 1/3 of an average meal? Not much at all, comparatively. If you're still concerned about efficiency, slap a small electric motor on the bike, but even a fully human-powered bike is more energy efficient than driving an entire car.
The last time I argued this with an American, they correctly claimed that they defeated us in combat and claimed our language as their own, so it's kinda theirs now. There's no valid argument against it, so I had to concede defeat.
Margherita pizza is best with the absolute freshest mozzarella you can find. This often comes in big wet blob form and is much easier to slice into circles rather than grate. It won't make the finished product any more or less of a Margherita pizza if it's grated or chopped and spread more evenly if that's your preference, but I kinda like the variation in bites you get with this configuration.
Well, he was recently impeached, where he must face a trial in the Texas legislature to determine whether he should be removed from office. Most of the Texas legislature are from the same political party as him, though, and they acquitted him of all charges.
I'm sure that would be relevant if my body was attempting to push an entire car to work every day. When I cycle to work, I'm carrying at most 15 kilos of bike and belongings with me. With the efficiency multiplier of gears and wheels, I believe my 8 kilometer trip burns about 200 kilocalories. I don't think that much energy will move an entire 2000 kilo car very far at all, whether it's powered with electricity or petrol.
Considering LGBTQ+ is a protected group in the USA
[citation needed]
As far as I understand, the US "Equality Act" fizzled out the last time it tried to make its way through the US parliament. That would codify LGBTQ+ protections into actual law in the US. The closest thing I can find is a Supreme Court ruling that LGBTQ protections are covered under the Civil Rights Act in Bostock v. Clayton County, but the Supreme Court is a fickle beast, and I doubt they would rule the same way today if it were challenged again.
Listen, my highly-offended dude, the comment I am replying to said "but don't shame others for wanting a clean dick."
If you think that means something other than "mutilated dick = clean dick", then maybe we're not even speaking the same language, and you're gonna have an aneurysm trying to defend ol' dirty dick upthread.
no. I'd interpret "misosophist" as somebody who HATES wisdom/teaching/thought. I'm just playing at being a sophist who is probably more often wrong than right (including possibly with the dubious etymology of my own handle). I really didn't put much thought into it when signing up for lemmy, though.
I mean, I've met Americans that don't clean their dicks, so it's not wrong, but it's not really the norm. Sure, most people clean their dick, but if you honestly think cutting your dick up makes it cleaner, then I'm going to assume you just don't get near it with soap and water because any dick can be cleaned with soap and water.
Pretty much anything below 1/32 (0.8mm) of an inch, we'll switch to decimals.
0.0001 inch is valid with no common way to make that neater. No such thing as 1 mili-inch.
.001" is a thou or mil (1/1000 of an inch). That is commonly understood in any industry that requires that precision and also doesn't already work in metric by default. 0.0001 would be 0.1 thou, but honestly any time I've ever seen anybody need more precision than a whole number thou, they worked in microns or nanometers.
This is why I don't fuck Americans. They honestly think their unwashed mutilated dicks are clean. Circumcised dicks are fine if that's what you got, but you still have to clean them just like any other dick.
Not OP, but my dog is potty trained, so when she was in a similar situation a couple years ago, I'd remove the pants when she asked to go outside to potty. Then I would stand by the door and watch her while she did her business to make sure she didn't try biting at her stitches. When she was done, the pants went back on and I let her freely roam the house again. Pretty straightforward.
There are lots of tankies in the West. I interpreted the use of the Canadian flag in the comic to just indicate that it was one of those over-enthusiastic tankaboos rather than an actual Russian defending their own military strength. It could have just as easily been a US or Euro flag to get the point across. I don't think it's a commentary on Canadians specifically.
No, I'm not saying that at all. That's not how hypotheticals work. If their hypothesis is that a better democratic candidate exists, then that candidate must be a better candidate than Biden. I do agree that your idea of an imaginary candidate is, indeed, stupid.