Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MI
Posts
1
Comments
214
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • TBH the most juvenile person in that thread was you, by far. Let the devs manage tickets the way they want to, who are you to say that their form of discussion by opening and closing is wrong if it works for them? Your initial point was valid but then you started acting all high and mighty in a way that didn't contribute anything, I'm not surprised that they don't have time to deal with your shit, especially when you go and make a such a big drama over a 7 day ban.

  • A union is a good idea but this is also something you can and should take into your own hands too. If your wage hasn't gone up at all in a couple years you should be complaining about that very loudly to your bosses individually. It helps even more if you can get some other job offers to be able to compare your current wage to

  • People have been saying that about Chrome for at least a decade and it's never happened. If it does actually happen (it won't) then I'll switch but no reason to switch before then.

  • I love Lemmy but I find the extreme pro-FOSS bias and hatred of everything else to be pretty abrasive and not conducive to useful or interesting discussion. And that's coming from someone who both loves to use and contribute to FOSS. But my preferred desktop OS isn't Linux which apparently according to the Lemmy hivemind is a big no-no.

    I think more Lemmy users need to learn that the upvote and downvote buttons aren't meant to be used to indicate agreement and disagreement respectively, it's to indicate if a comment is valuable contribution to the discussion regardless of whether or not you agree.

    In a post discussing Chrome, a few comments about alternative browsers make sense. But if there are 100s and 100s of comments all just saying some variation of "switch to Firefox otherwise you suck" and those are the only ones that are upvoted, then the whole comment section becomes pointless.

  • ITT: nobody actually reading the article

    Initially, it was suggested that this removal impacted Google’s synched Chrome bookmarks but further research reveals that’s not the case. Instead, the removals apply to Google’s saved feature.

    This Google service allows users to save and organize links, similar to what Pinterest does. These link collections can be private or shared with third parties.

  • This has got nothing to do with browsers. The article is saying that if you use an online Google service to save Google search results, then when they are forced to take said search result down due to DMCA then it also is (obviously) gone from the saved collection. This could just as easily happen in Firefox if you use Google's saved pages service, which is a bit like Pinterest. Meanwhile Chrome, like Firefox, never touches your actual bookmarks