millie @ millie @beehaw.org

Posts

10

Comments

1,010

Joined

2 yr. ago

Honestly, if there were tight restrictions on how the footage is used and what cases it's allowed to be turned over for, these are probably less dangerous than actual armed human beings running around. Robots don't have a sense of egotism unless they're programmed to, and hopefully wouldn't be armed.

Knowing the kind of tech bros that seem to typically start companies like this, though? I could see it being an incredibly intrusive form of data mining. Seems like yet another case of technology that could be really helpful in the right hands, but a mess of enshittification in the hands of money-grubbing cap capitalists.

Having played Palworld a bit, some of the monsters are distinct from Pokemon, but some of them are incredibly obvious clones.

But like, looking back at some of the knock-off toys I remember seeing in the 80s and early 90s? It definitely seems like copyright has gotten more robust in its attempted overreach.

Someone ought to invert the colors, stick it in a jokey box, and call it a fair use parody.

Wouldn't that be the case with most people who've moved to a new area? Like, presumably unless they're there for work, school, or family or a spouse they moved because they wanted to get out of wherever they were. I'd imagine that if you go to Ohio and ask people how they like it, you'd probably find more people who are happy living there.

I feel like listening to your gut is a big component of this. There have been times when I notice that the way someone talks bothers me for a reason I can't put my finger on and I decide to give them the benefit of the doubt, assuming I'm being shallow or unreasonable, but then a few months or even years later their behavior lines up with my initial discomfort and I realize I had spotted something being off from the start. Sometimes it's better to listen to the general feeling you're getting from the less verbal and analytical parts of yourself than to wait until you have a real explanation.

Of course, there may be people who are just anxious or a little eccentric and that's what you're spotting, but usually it's worth at least sniffing it out from a distance rather than fully ignoring those feelings until you can articulate the reason for them.

Mushrooms are pretty loud talkers, tbh. Just gotta listen to the right ones. 😂

This is the problem with spending millions of dollars on games and focusing on profitability over actual quality or expression. Video games are fundamentally an art medium. You can choose to make some uninspired cash grabbing trash, and can even make a whole company built around that and make profit. But are you going to make a great game that way? Probably not.

You'd be better off with half a dozen people with passion and a comparatively minuscule budget. You might have to scale back from ultra realistic graphics and massive explorable areas with dozens of voice actors, but I don't really think that makes games any better anyway. A little 2d rpg with really basic pixel graphics can put a big project to shame if it's made with passion and emotion.

I kinda like it. It's better for some shows than others, but like, look at Curb Your Enthusiasm. It would pop up every now and then, only to fade back into the aether for a few years, then come around again. It never felt forced, or like it wasn't within its own continuity when it came back. Some time just passed, and that was alright. I feel the same way about Red Dwarf. It comes, it goes, it comes back again. We love it.

You can't force it. It's one thing if delays are because of studios or rights holders blocking creators from getting their work out, but if it's part of the natural process? The process is the product, and sometimes good work needs time to percolate, or ferment, or whatever metaphor you want.

Don't try!

It seems like a pretty good survival strategy for a species to routinely produce a number of different sorts of constituent organisms in order to have the tools ready to be more adaptable to varying circumstances. Considering how much humans specialize their routine behaviors and the way in which we work together both consciously and through larger interconnected systems, it isn't surprising to see a variety of strategies to process information, make decisions, and communicate with one another. Thinking outside the status quo creates opportunities that can independently either succeed or fail of their own applicability and ability to be executed. If everyone is looking for the same things, they're likely to miss a lot. Even if many of those arrangements don't produce the desired result, they can be a valuable exploration for new resources and strategies.

It seems an extremely dire mistake in these circumstances to label one particular mode of thought the ideal and reject all contradiction as dysfunctional or useless.

Given the responses in this thread, it seems that the same bias exists even in ostensibly leftist spaces. Yikes.

Y'all need to get out more.

The money from energy companies dripping from both sides of this interview is disturbingly clear. My only hope is that where CNN is clearly grilling Harris for the interests of their investors (energy companies), Harris' evasive responses are there to assuage the concerns of those investors long enough to get into office. She's talking out of the side of her mouth for someone and probably needs to to get in office. I just hope that at the end of the day she sides with Earth and humanity over evil incarnate. I think she will, but she has to walk a tightrope to get there.

If I'm wrong I'll probably be part of a literal chorus of leftists looking to make it extremely clear that she can be a one-term president if she doesn't find her way to doing the right thing.

Using someone else's IP, such as claiming that something you're distributing is an episode of their show, most certainly qualifies for a valid DMCA takedown notice.

For the past few years I lived out in the suburbs where buying anything meant either driving around and doing a whole thing or ordering something online and getting it a day or two later. I ordered everything.

Now I'm back to living downtown in a small city, and I've literally used Amazon only once in the past three months, to buy something that isn't available locally. It's much nicer.

I literally don't set up my voicemail, and I typically don't listen to recorded audio that gets messaged to me. Texting is functional and doesn't leave me some anxiety-provoking message that I have to sit through and digest without saying anything. If a conversation needs to happen in voice, text to say that and see if it's a good time.

Wild that people just ring a personal phone number unprompted in 2024 without that being an established routine.

That said, I also remember when it wasn't at all weird to show up to someone's house and knock on their door. Things have really changed.

I feel like this would be much better suited as an article. Or like, at least with a synopsis. An hour is a long time to watch some guy sitting with his phone in his hand without at least having a preview of what he's discussing.

Moving blankets are a wonderful solution. Hang them over your windows and enjoy the quiet. Get thick ones. Uhaul has good ones.

Check out this modern day Holocaust-denial level bullshit. Eventually this will be known to be just as malicious. It's weird that it isn't already.

Putin only pays to derail Democrat energy.

Taking a quick look at some population density maps, it's not hard to see why this might be the case. The US is very spread out in comparison to the world's denser population centers, and even in comparison to Europe. Buses and trains connecting cities and towns not only have further to go, but the funding for them is more spread out. We've got pretty robust subway and bus systems in many of our metro areas, with New York and Boston being particularly notable, but if you want to leave the city you need a car. That means that we're going to have to cater to that kind of transportation to a greater degree than a smaller country that can easily connect most of its populace with public transportation.

In a lot of the US, if you don't have access to some sort of personal vehicle or a taxi service, you're not going anywhere without a major hike. There are some cases where this could be improved, like extending commuter rails further, but it's not a fix for everywhere.

Also, in the case of states with low population density they both lack the funding and the public support for increased public services like robust transportation. Some of these payee states that can't cover the cost of their own roads anyway are skeptical of supporting public services, and their conservative legislature seems to like it that way.

We can definitely do better, but sometimes I feel like the folks who say we should just get rid of cars and all take public transport have never been out in the sticks.